Abstract:The concept of self is central to personhood, but personality research has largely ignored the relevance of recent advances in self–concept theory: multidimensionality of self–concept (focusing instead on self–esteem, an implicit unidimensional approach), domain specificity (generalizability of trait manifestations over different domains), and multilevel perspectives in which social–cognitive processes and contextual effects drive self–perceptions at different levels (individual, group/institution, and country) aligned to Bronfenbrenner's ecological model. Here, we provide theoretical and empirical support for psychological comparison processes that influence self–perceptions and their relation to distal outcomes. Our meta–theoretical integration of social and dimensional comparison theories synthesizes five seemingly paradoxical frame–of–reference and contextual effects in self–concept formation that occur at different levels. The effects were tested with a sample of 485,490 fifteen–year–old students (68 countries/regions, 18,292 schools). Consistent with the dimensional comparison theory, the effects on math self–concept were positive for math achievement but negative for verbal achievement. Consistent with the social comparison theory, the effects on math self–concept were negative for school–average math achievement (big–fish–little–pond effect), country–average achievement (paradoxical cross–cultural effect), and being young relative to year in school but positive for school–average verbal achievement (big–fish–little–pond effect—compensatory effect). We demonstrate cross–cultural generalizability/universality of support for predictions and discuss implications for personality research. © 2020 European Association of Personality Psychology

Self-concept: The application of a frame of reference model to explain paradoxical results

Determinants of student self-concept: Is it better to be a relatively large fish in a small pond even if you don't learn to swim as well?

Subject-specific components of academic self-concept and self-efficacy

The structure of academic self-concept: The Marsh/Shavelson model.

Explaining paradoxical relations between academic self-concepts and achievements: cross-cultural generalizability of the internal/external frame of reference predictions across …

Self-concept, social comparison, and ability grouping: A reply to Kulik and Kulik

Academic self-concept

Influences of internal and external frames of reference on the formation of math and English self-concepts.

Preadolescent self‐concept: Its relation to self‐concept as inferred by teachers and to academic ability

Causal effects of academic self-concept on academic achievement: Structural equation models of longitudinal data.

Psychological Comparison Processes and Self–Concept in Relation to Five Distinct Frame–Of–Reference Effects: Pan–Human Cross–Cultural Generalizability over 68 Countries

Academic self-concept: Theory, measurement, and research

A multifaceted academic self-concept: Its hierarchical structure and its relation to academic achievement.

Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology

Relations among dimensions of self-attribution, dimensions of self-concept, and academic achievements.

Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement, and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self …

Failure of high-ability high schools to deliver academic benefits commensurate with their students’ ability levels

The Pivotal Role of Frames of Reference in Academic Self-Concept Formation: The" Big Fish-Little Pond" Effect.

Academic self-concept: Beyond the dustbowl

Content specificity of relations between academic achievement and academic self-concept.

The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept.