Abstract:Background: How we build and maintain representations of ourselves involves both explicit features which are consciously accessible on reflection and implicit processes which are not, such as attentional biases. Understanding relations between different ways of measuring self-cognition both within and across such cognitive domains is important for understanding how selves may differ from one another, and whether self-cognition is best understood as largely uni-dimensional or more multi-dimensional. Further, uncovering this structure should inform research around how self-cognition relates to psychiatric and psychological conditions. This study explores the relations between different constructs of self-cognition and how variability within them relates to psychiatric traits. Methods: Our final dataset includes within-subject (n = 288, general population) measures of explicit self-concept (using both the Self Concept Clarity Scale and Self Concept and Identity Measure), implicit self-prioritisation in a shape-label matching task (for both reaction time and sensitivity) and measurement of traits for five psychiatric conditions (autism, borderline personality disorder, schizophrenia, depression and anxiety). We first test whether self-cognitive measures within and across domains are correlated within individuals. We then test whether these dimensions of self-cognition support a binary distinction between psychiatric conditions that either are or are not characterised in terms of self, or whether they support self-cognition as transdiagnostically predictive of the traits associated with psychiatric conditions. To do this we run a series of planned correlations, regressions, and direct correlation comparison statistics. Results: Results show that implicit self-prioritisation measures were not correlated with the explicit self-concept measures nor the psychiatric trait measures. In contrast, all the psychiatric traits scores were predicted, to varying degrees, by poorer explicit self-concept quality. Specifically, borderline personality disorder traits were significantly more strongly associated with composite explicit self-concept measures than any of depression, anxiety, or autism traits scores were. Conclusions: Our results suggest that selves can differ considerably, along different cognitive dimensions. Further, our results show that self-cognition may be a promising feature to include in future dimensional characterisations of psychiatric conditions, but care should be taken to choose relevant self-cognitive domains.

Some Correlates of Self-Concept: Academic Achievement, Gender, Age, Home Environment, and Test Anxiety

Self-Concept Discrepancy and Value Orientation of Undergraduates

Disentangling self-concept clarity and self-esteem in young adults.

A Study on the Predictive Validity of Self-concept for Subjective Well-being with the Approach of Implicit Social Cognition

A Review of Factors Related to Self-Concept Clarity

Self-Perceived Competence and Test Anxiety

Self-Concept Clarity : Measurement , Personality Correlates , and Cultural Boundaries

Self-concept in adolescence: A longitudinal study on reciprocal effects of self-perceptions in academic and social domains

Who am I? A second-order meta-analytic review of correlates of the self in childhood and adolescence.

Self-esteem and interpersonal difficulties of college students: Influences of self-control and self-concept

Self-esteem and clarity of the self-concept.

Gender Differences in Social Comparison Processes and Self-Concept Among Students

Self-concept as a Moderator of Relationships between Stressful life events and Depression,Anxiety

Neural Correlates of Academic Self-concept and the Association with Academic Achievement in Older Children

Self-concept and Mental Health of College Students

How selves differ within and across cognitive domains: self-prioritisation, self-concept, and psychiatric traits

The structure of the self-concept and its relation to psychological adjustment

Anxiety, Depression, Stress, General Self-Efficacy and Specific Self-Efficacy: Comparison among Science and Social Science Students

Psychological Comparison Processes and Self–Concept in Relation to Five Distinct Frame–Of–Reference Effects: Pan–Human Cross–Cultural Generalizability over 68 Countries

A Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Scores on a Chinese Version of an Academic Self-Concept Scale and its Invariance across Groups

Academic self-concept, perceptions of the learning environment, engagement, and learning outcomes of university students: relationships and causal ordering