Abstract:Background: There is a growing recognition of the key role of the therapeutic relationship in the outcomes of psychotherapy. However, current understanding of its specific components, their interplay and related patient-therapist dynamics is limited. Objective: (a) To validate two self-report measures to assess subjective affective reactions of patients toward their psychotherapists during specific therapy sessions, and (b) to explore the relationships and dynamics among four elements of the therapeutic relationship: patient reactions toward the therapist, working alliance, alliance ruptures and repairs, and the real relationship. Methods: This study uses a nonrandomized, two-time point longitudinal design. The target population is adult patients currently engaged in individual psychotherapy for heterogeneous mental conditions. Participants are recruited through two online recruitment platforms: Research for Me and ResearchMatch. Data collection involves administering two surveys through the Qualtrics online survey platform. The baseline survey assesses information about the most recent therapy session and the preceding week, while the follow-up survey collects data on the subsequent therapy session and the days leading up to it. Discussion: This research offers three main contributions: (a) it furthers evidence-based assessment in psychotherapy by creating and validating two novel, succinct self-report tools; (b) it enhances theoretical understanding within therapeutic relationship research by exploring the significant impact of patients' perceptions of relationship elements on session outcomes variability; and (c) it will identify therapeutic relationship elements that can either enhance or hinder the overall relationship quality and session outcomes. Ethics and dissemination: The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. The results will be published in indexed peer-reviewed journals and presented at relevant psychology and psychiatry conferences.

The relationship between session frequency and psychotherapy outcome in a naturalistic setting.

Psychotherapy session frequency: A naturalistic examination in a university counseling center.

Dose–effect relationship in routine outpatient psychotherapy: Does treatment duration matter?

Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level.

Relation of Treatment Frequency and Duration to Psychotherapeutic Outcome.

The Effectiveness of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: the Role of Treatment Duration, Frequency of Sessions, and the Therapeutic Relationship

Session frequency in routine psychology practice and perspectives on session scheduling: a mixed-methods study of clinician attitudes and practices

Amount and frequency of psychotherapy as predictors of treatment outcome for adult depression: A meta-regression analysis

Investigating the dose–response effect in open-ended psychotherapy

Therapist effects on early change in psychotherapy in a naturalistic setting

Individual differences in response to once versus twice weekly sessions of CBT and IPT for depression.

Is there a dose-effect relationship between the number of psychotherapy sessions and improvement of social functioning?

Therapeutic relationship elements and therapy session outcomes: Protocol for a longitudinal study of the patient's perspective

The effects of once- versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients

Dimensions of psychotherapy: A factor-analytic study of ratings of psychotherapy sessions.

Ranking the Correlates of Psychotherapy Duration

Models of Psychotherapy Outcome: Are They Applicable in Training Clinics?

Problem severity, treatment duration, and the outcome of psychotherapy: The benefits keep growing with time spent in treatment for longer than previously known

Psychoanalysis conducted at reduced frequencies.

The dose-response effect in routinely delivered psychological therapies: A systematic review