Abstract:Reports an error in "Do psychotherapists improve with time and experience? A longitudinal analysis of outcomes in a clinical setting" by Simon B. Goldberg, Tony Rousmaniere, Scott D. Miller, Jason Whipple, Stevan Lars Nielsen, William T. Hoyt and Bruce E. Wampold ( Journal of Counseling Psychology , 2016[Jan], Vol 63[1], 1-11). The article (https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000131), had an error in the Method section in the Early termination section under the Variables heading. The coding was reversed in the sentence "Patients received a code of 0 (early termination) or 1 (nonearly termination) on this dichotomous variable" and should have read "Patients received a code of 1 (early termination) or 0 (nonearly termination) on this dichotomous variable." The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2015-58774-001.) Objective: Psychotherapy researchers have long questioned whether increased therapist experience is linked to improved outcomes. Despite numerous cross-sectional studies examining this question, no large-scale longitudinal study has assessed within-therapist changes in outcomes over time. Method: The present study examined changes in psychotherapists' outcomes over time using a large, longitudinal, naturalistic psychotherapy data set. The sample included 6,591 patients seen in individual psychotherapy by 170 therapists who had on average 4.73 years of data in the data set (range = 0.44 to 17.93 years). Patient-level outcomes were examined using the Outcome Questionnaire-45 and a standardized metric of change (prepost d). Two-level multilevel models (patients nested within therapist) were used to examine the relationship between therapist experience and patient prepost d and early termination. Experience was examined both as chronological time and cumulative patients seen. Results: Therapists achieved outcomes comparable with benchmarks from clinical trials. However, a very small but statistically significant change in outcome was detected indicating that on the whole, therapists' patient prepost d tended to diminish as experience (time or cases) increases. This small reduction remained when controlling for several patient-level, caseload-level, and therapist-level characteristics, as well as when excluding several types of outliers. Further, therapists were shown to vary significantly across time, with some therapists showing improvement despite the overall tendency for outcomes to decline. In contrast, therapists showed lower rates of early termination as experience increased. Conclusions: Implications of these findings for the development of expertise in psychotherapy are explored. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Problem severity, treatment duration, and the outcome of psychotherapy: The benefits keep growing with time spent in treatment for longer than previously known

Investigating the dose–response effect in open-ended psychotherapy

The Effectiveness of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: the Role of Treatment Duration, Frequency of Sessions, and the Therapeutic Relationship

Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level.

"It takes time to see the whole picture": patients' views on improvement in cognitive behavioral therapy and psychodynamic therapy after three years

Dose–effect relationship in routine outpatient psychotherapy: Does treatment duration matter?

Psychotherapy duration and work disability: A prospective Finnish register study

Predictors of Treatment Duration and Retention in a Study of Long-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy: Childhood Adversity, Adult Personality, and Diagnosis

Correction to Goldberg et al. (2016).

Duration of psychotherapy has little association with outcome

Estimating treatment duration for psychotherapy in primary care

Variability in treatment effects in an English national dataset of psychological therapies: The relationships between severity, treatment duration, and therapy type

Relation of Treatment Frequency and Duration to Psychotherapeutic Outcome.

The effect of individual short- and long-term psychotherapy on perceived social support: analysis of secondary outcomes of a randomized clinical trial

The Effectiveness of Brief Versus Intermediate Duration Psychodynamic Psychotherapy in the Treatment of Adjustment Disorder

The 10-year course of mental health, quality of life, and exile life functioning in traumatized refugees from treatment start

Psychotherapy session frequency: A naturalistic examination in a university counseling center.

Comparison of short- and long-term dynamic group psychotherapy: randomised clinical trial

Responsive regulation of treatment duration in routine practice in United Kingdom primary care settings: Replication in a larger sample.

The relationship between session frequency and psychotherapy outcome in a naturalistic setting.