Abstract:BackgroundCognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and interpersonal therapy (IPT) are among the most well established therapies for the treatment of depression. However, some major questions remain unanswered. First, it is unknown what session frequency results in the most optimal (cost) effectiveness in psychotherapy. Second, the debate as to what mechanisms underlie the effect of psychotherapy has not yet been resolved. Enhancing knowledge about the optimal session frequency and mechanisms of change seems crucial in order to optimize the (cost) effectiveness of psychotherapy for depression. This study aims to compare treatment outcome of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of CBT and IPT. We expect twice-weekly sessions to be more effective and lead to more rapid recovery of depressive symptoms in comparison to once-weekly sessions. Both therapy-specific and non-specific process measures will be included to unravel the mechanisms of change in psychotherapy for depression. Besides the use of self-reports and behavioral observations, this study will also examine underlying biological processes by collecting blood samples.MethodIn a multicenter randomized trial, two hundred depressed patients will be recruited from Dutch specialized mental healthcare centers and randomized into one of the following groups, all receiving a maximum of 20 sessions in different frequencies: a) twice-weekly sessions at the start of CBT, b) twice-weekly sessions at the start of IPT, c) once-weekly sessions at the start of CBT, d) once-weekly sessions at the start of IPT. Primary outcome measures are depression severity, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. Process measures include therapeutic alliance, recall, therapy-specific skills, motivation and compliance. Assessments will take place during baseline, monthly during treatment and follow-up at month 9, 12 and 24. In addition, at 12 and 24 months, the frequency of depressive episodes in the previous year will be assessed. Blood samples will be taken pre- and post-treatment. The study has been ethically approved and registered.DiscussionFinding that twice-weekly sessions are more effective or lead to more rapid recovery of depressive symptoms could lead to treatment adaptations that have the potential to reduce the personal and societal burden of depression. In addition, insight into the mechanisms of change and physiological processes in psychotherapy will enable us to optimize treatments and may help to understand human functioning beyond the context of treatment.Trial registrationThe study has been registered on October 21th, 2014 at the Netherlands Trial Register, part of the Dutch Cochrane Centre (NTR4856).

Psychotherapy session frequency: A naturalistic examination in a university counseling center.

The relationship between session frequency and psychotherapy outcome in a naturalistic setting.

Session frequency in routine psychology practice and perspectives on session scheduling: a mixed-methods study of clinician attitudes and practices

Individual differences in response to once versus twice weekly sessions of CBT and IPT for depression.

The Effectiveness of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy: the Role of Treatment Duration, Frequency of Sessions, and the Therapeutic Relationship

Amount and frequency of psychotherapy as predictors of treatment outcome for adult depression: A meta-regression analysis

Dose-effect relations and responsive regulation of treatment duration: The good enough level.

Relation of Treatment Frequency and Duration to Psychotherapeutic Outcome.

The effects of once- versus twice-weekly sessions on psychotherapy outcomes in depressed patients

Therapist effects on early change in psychotherapy in a naturalistic setting

Dose–effect relationship in routine outpatient psychotherapy: Does treatment duration matter?

Psychotherapy utilization by United States college students

How much psychotherapy is needed to treat depression? A metaregression analysis

Frequency and change mechanisms of psychotherapy among depressed patients: study protocol for a multicenter randomized trial comparing twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of CBT and IPT

Long-term outcomes of once weekly v. twice weekly sessions of cognitive behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for depression

Estimating treatment duration for psychotherapy in primary care

Treatment Duration and Termination Status Among Clients in a University-Based Counseling Center

Problem severity, treatment duration, and the outcome of psychotherapy: The benefits keep growing with time spent in treatment for longer than previously known

Variability in treatment effects in an English national dataset of psychological therapies: The relationships between severity, treatment duration, and therapy type

Cost-effectiveness of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of cognitive–behavioural therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for depression at 12 months after start of treatment: randomised controlled trial

Internet‐Based Treatment for Panic Disorder: Does Frequency of Therapist Contact Make a Difference?