Assessing the role of dryness and burning sensation in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux

Xiaowei Zheng,Zhiwei Chen,Ting Chen,Liqun Zhou,Chaofeng Liu,Jingyi Zheng,Renyou Hu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55420-y
IF: 4.6
2024-02-25
Scientific Reports
Abstract:Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) is a condition characterized by the regurgitation of stomach and duodenal contents into the laryngopharynx, with variable and non-specific symptoms. Therefore, developing an accurate symptom scale for different regions is essential. Notably, the symptoms of "dryness and burning sensation in the laryngopharynx or mouth" are prevalent among the Chinese population but are often omitted from conventional symptom assessment scales, such as the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Symptom Score-12 (RSS-12) scales. To address this gap, our study incorporated the symptoms into the RSI and RSS-12 scales, developing the RSI-10/RSS-13 scales. Afterward, we assessed the role of the new scale's reliability (Cronbach's α and test–retest reliability), construct validity (confirmatory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis), and diagnostic efficiency. Our study encompassed 479 participants (average = 39.5 ± 13.4 years, 242 female) and 91 (average = 34.01 ± 13.50 years, 44 female) completed 24 h MII-pH monitoring. The Cronbach's α values of 0.80 and 0.82 for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 scales, respectively. RSI-10 and RSS-13 exhibited strong test–retest reliability (ICCs = 0.82–0.96) and diagnostic efficacy (AUC = 0.84–0.85). Furthermore, the factor analysis identified the RSS-13 and its three sub-scales (ear-nose-throat, digestive tract, respiratory tract) exhibited good to excellent structural validity (χ 2 /df = 1.95, P < 0.01; CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.06, SRMR = 0.05). The AUC optimal thresholds for the RSI-10 and RSS-13 in the Chinese population were 13 and 36, respectively. Besides, the inclusion of the new item significantly improved the diagnostic efficiency of the RSI scale ( P = 0.04), suggesting that RSI-10 holds promise as a more effective screening tool for LPRD, and global validation is needed to demonstrate the impact of this new symptom on the diagnosis of LPRD.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### The Problem the Paper Aims to Solve This paper aims to address an issue in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). LPRD is an inflammatory condition of the upper respiratory tract tissues caused by the reflux of gastric and duodenal contents. Its symptoms are non-specific and varied, such as sore throat and hoarseness. Currently, common diagnostic methods include 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (24 h MII-pH), but this method requires high medical conditions. Therefore, in clinical practice, symptom scoring scales are mainly relied upon for screening. However, existing symptom scoring scales (such as the Reflux Symptom Index RSI and the Reflux Symptom Score-12 RSS-12) lack some symptoms common in the Chinese population, particularly "dryness and burning sensation in the throat or mouth." These symptoms are very common in LPRD patients but are overlooked in conventional symptom assessment scales. This may lead to missed diagnoses of LPRD. To address this issue, the study incorporates the symptom "dryness and burning sensation in the throat or mouth" into the RSI and RSS-12 scales, forming new RSI-10 and RSS-13 scales, and evaluates the reliability, structural validity, and diagnostic efficacy of the new scales. Specifically, the study proceeds through the following steps: 1. **Incorporating New Symptoms**: Adding the symptom "dryness and burning sensation in the throat or mouth" into the RSI and RSS-12 scales. 2. **Evaluating the Reliability of the New Scales**: Assessing the internal consistency and stability of the new scales through Cronbach’s α coefficient and test-retest reliability. 3. **Evaluating the Structural Validity of the New Scales**: Assessing the structural validity of the new scales through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA). 4. **Evaluating the Diagnostic Efficacy of the New Scales**: Assessing the diagnostic efficacy of the new scales through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and calculating the area under the curve (AUC) value. Through these evaluations, the study aims to verify the effectiveness and superiority of the new scales in diagnosing LPRD, especially for the Chinese population. Ultimately, the study finds that the new scales show significant improvements in reliability and diagnostic efficacy, particularly demonstrating higher accuracy in identifying LPRD patients.