Reliability of the Reflux Finding Score Used in Chinese Laryngologist

LI Jinrang,Peter C Belafsky,ZHANG Lihong
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16066/j.1672-7002.2012.07.017
2012-01-01
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To evaluate the reliability of the reflux finding score(RFS)used in Chinese laryngologist.METHODS Fifty laryngeal photos were collected from the patients in the clinic of Voice and Swallowing Center,University of California Davis,from Feb.10,2009 to April.30,2009.For intrarater and interrater reliability assessment,a Chinese laryngologist(Jinrang Li)and an American laryngologist(Peter C Belafsky) blindly determined the RFSāon two separate occasions respectively.RESULTS The mean RFS for Chinese laryngologist was 8.28±2.78 at the initial screening and 8.10±2.75 at the repeat evaluation.The mean RFS for American laryngologist was 8.20±2.77 at the initial screening and 7.84±3.13 at the repeat evaluation.There were no difference in the mean RFS and each individual item comparing among the each evaluation of the two laryngologists(P0.05).The correlation coefficients of RFSāof the two evaluations by Dr.Li and Dr.Belafsky were 0.929 and 0.874 respectively.The correlation coefficient of RFS comparing Chinese and American laryngologist of their initial screening was 0.703.We considered a RFS≥7 as abnormal.The percentage intrarater agreement for Dr.Li and Dr.Belafsky was 94%(κ=0.861,P0.0001)and 94%(κ=0.855,P0.0001)respectively.The percentage interrater agreement between the two laryngologists was 88%(κ=0.663,P0.0001).CONCLUSION The results demonstrate good inter-and intrarater reproducibility in Chinese and American laryngologists and RFS can be used in Chinese laryngologists for screening the laryngopharyngeal reflux patients.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?