Abstract:OCCUPATIONAL APPLICATIONS This paper synthesizes the current literature on industrial-use, active and passive upper-limb exoskeletons, as an aid to health and safety specialists, ergonomics practitioners, and policy-makers that may be considering or regulating their use. Reported here are the effects of exoskeleton use on muscular activity; endurance and fatigue; kinematics and range of motion; productivity and quality; discomfort and pain; and usability and subjective feedback. A moderate level of evidence emerged, supporting the efficacy of passive upper limb exoskeletons in reducing muscular demands on the anterior and middle deltoid during occupational tasks, primarily those tasks involving overhead work. Given the nascence of research in this area, however, there is insufficient evidence to support the efficacy of active upper limb exoskeletons. Practitioners are encouraged to explore the effectiveness of passive exoskeleton use to reduce musculoskeletal disorder risk, particularly for overhead work. However, more research on the efficacy of active exoskeletons is recommended prior to field trials. TECHNICAL ABSTRACT Background: Recently, interest has surged regarding industrial-use exoskeletons as personal protective equipment to reduce work-related musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs). Purpose: Reviews existing evidence on the efficacy and effectiveness of industrial-use upper limb exoskeletons for reducing exposures to factors linked to MSD risk, and for improving productivity and quality. Methods: Scopus, PubMed, and CINAHL were searched systematically for relevant, English, peer-reviewed journal articles published between January 2000 and February 2019. Retained papers were quality-appraised using a modified CONSORT 2010 checklist, where an evidence synthesis algorithm was used to determine the level of evidence separately for active and passive exoskeletons. Results: A total of 799 articles were retrieved, 14 articles of which met inclusion criteria and were retained for analysis. Studies commonly reported on the effects of exoskeleton use on measures of muscular activity; endurance and fatigue; kinematics and range of motion; productivity and quality; discomfort and pain; and usability and subjective feedback. A moderate level of evidence was found supporting the efficacy of passive upper limb exoskeletons in reducing muscular demand on the anterior and middle deltoid muscles during occupational tasks, particularly overhead work; however, there is limited and insufficient evidence regarding impacts on measures related to kinematics and fatigue. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of active exoskeletons, due to the lack of medium-to-high quality studies with consistent findings. Conclusions: Considering the current state of evidence, those considering upper-limb exoskeletons for MSD prevention, particular for overhead work, may wish to consider passive systems rather than active systems at this time. High-quality research should continue to investigate the efficacy of active systems and effectiveness of both active and passive exoskeletons as an intervention to reduce MSDs. Exoskeleton efficacy and effectiveness research quality can be improved by including samples representative of industrial workers and by strengthening study power.

User Impressions and Gait Analysis of Exoskeleton Device Usage in Generalized Tank Farm Activities

Field assessment of active BSE: Trends over test days of subjective indicators and self-reported fatigue for railway construction workers

A comparative study of biomechanical assessments in laboratory and field settings for manual material handling tasks using extractor tools and exoskeletons

Metabolic adaptation and related biomechanics in an ankle-based exoskeleton system during six sessions of steady state walking

User-Centered Evaluation of the Wearable Walker Lower Limb Exoskeleton; Preliminary Assessment Based on the Experience Protocol

Exoskeletons for workers: A case series study in an enclosures production line

Effects of an industrial passive assistive exoskeleton on muscle activity, oxygen consumption and subjective responses during lifting tasks

From unknown to familiar: An exploratory longitudinal field study on occupational exoskeletons adoption

User-centered evaluation of the Wearable Walker lower limb exoskeleton, preliminary assessment based on the Experience protocol

Neural, Muscular, and Perceptual responses with shoulder exoskeleton use over Days

Active back exosuits demonstrate positive usability perceptions that drive intention-to-use in the field among logistic warehouse workers

Impact of a passive upper-body exoskeleton on muscular activity and precision in overhead single and dual tasks: an explorative randomized crossover study

Exoskeleton acceptance and its relationship to self-efficacy enhancement, perceived usefulness, and physical relief: A field study among logistics workers

A Semi-active Exoskeleton Based on EMGs Reduces Muscle Fatigue When Squatting

Usability of an exosuit in domestic and community environments

Considerations for Industrial Use: A Systematic Review of the Impact of Active and Passive Upper Limb Exoskeletons on Physical Exposures

Industrial exoskeletons from bench to field: Human-machine interface and user experience in occupational settings and tasks

User-centered design of a personal-use exoskeleton: a clinical investigation on the feasibility and usability of the ABLE Exoskeleton device for individuals with spinal cord injury to perform skills for home and community environments

Biomechanical Effects of Using a Passive Exoskeleton for the Upper Limb in Industrial Manufacturing Activities: A Pilot Study

Evaluation of a passive back-support exoskeleton during in-bed patient handling tasks

The Assist Performance Test of Industrial Passive Waist-assistant Exoskeleton on Fatigue during a Repetitive Lifting Task