Abstract:Purpose of review: The optimal revascularization strategy for coronary artery disease depends on various factors, such as disease complexity, patient characteristics, and preferences. Including a heart team in complex cases is crucial to ensure optimal outcomes. Decision-making between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting must consider each patient's clinical profile and coronary anatomy. While current practice guidelines offer some insight into the optimal revascularization approach for the various phenotypes of coronary artery disease, the evidence to support either strategy continues to evolve and grow. Given the large amount of contemporary data on revascularization, this review aims to comprehensively summarize the literature on coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients across the spectrum of coronary artery disease phenotypes. Recent findings: Contemporary evidence suggests that for patients with triple vessel disease, coronary artery bypass grafting is preferred over percutaneous coronary intervention due to better long-term outcomes, including lower rates of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization. Similarly, for patients with left main coronary artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting can be considered, as they have shown similar efficacy in terms of major adverse cardiac events, but there may be a slightly higher risk of death with percutaneous coronary intervention. For proximal left anterior descending artery disease, both percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting are viable options, but coronary artery bypass grafting has shown lower rates of repeat revascularization and better relief from angina. The Synergy Between PCI with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery score can help in decision-making by predicting the risk of adverse events and guiding the choice between percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting. European and American guidelines both agree with including a heart team that can develop and lay out individualized, optimal treatment options with respect for patient preferences. The debate between coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention in multiple different scenarios will continue to develop as technology and techniques improve for both procedures. Risk factors, pre, peri, and post-procedural complications involved in both revascularization strategies will continue to be mitigated to optimize outcomes for those patients for which coronary artery bypass grafting or percutaneous coronary intervention provide ultimate benefit. Methods to avoid unnecessary revascularization continue to develop as well as percutaneous technology that may allow patients to avoid surgical intervention when possible. With such changes, revascularization guidelines for specific patient populations may change in the coming years, which can serve as a limitation of this time-dated review.

Coronary Physiology as Part of a State-of-the-Art Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategy

Coronary physiology in the catheterisation laboratory: an A to Z practical guide.

The Impact of Coronary Physiology on Contemporary Clinical Decision Making.

Coronary Physiology Assessment for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease

Coronary Physiology in the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

Physiologic Assessment of Coronary Stenosis: Current Status and Future Directions

Role of physiology in the management of multivessel disease among patients with acute coronary syndrome

The Role of Coronary Physiology Assessment in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Stable Angina. Dive Inside Recent Findings of Diffuse Coronary Disease Treatment

Physiology-guided myocardial revascularisation in complex multivessel coronary artery disease: beyond the 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularisation

Enhancing Precision in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Immediate post-procedural functional assessment of percutaneous coronary intervention: current evidence and future directions

The Current State of Coronary Revascularization: Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Advances in Three-Dimensional Coronary Imaging and Computational Fluid Dynamics

Influence of Pathophysiologic Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease on Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes

Illusion of revascularization: does anyone achieve optimal revascularization during percutaneous coronary intervention?

Advancements in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques: A Comprehensive Literature Review of Mixed Studies and Practice Guidelines

Angiography-derived Physiological Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease: Implications with Post-Stenting Physiology and Long-Term Clinical Outcomes

Preprocedural Physiological Assessment of Coronary Disease Patterns to Predict Haemodynamic Outcomes Post-Pci

Impact of the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) on PCI planning and decision-making

Physiological Distribution and Local Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Noninvasive Coronary Physiological Assessment Derived From Computed Tomography