Abstract:Background Impaired blood flow after PCI, reflected by low FFR, portends a worse prognosis. Prior to intervention, pressure gradient distributions offer insights into the likelihood of subsequent PCI success. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) serves as a quantifiable measure of CAD patterns: values approximating 1 signify focal disease, while values approaching 0 suggest diffuse disease. This study aimed to assess the impact of pathophysiological CAD patterns on the safety and efficacy of PCI. Methods PPG Global was a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter study, single-arm that enrolled patients with at least one lesion with an FFR ≤ 0.80 scheduled to be treated by PCI. The study enrolled 1004 patients (1057 vessels). A standardised physiological assessment was performed, including online PPG calculation from manual FFR pullbacks. CAD patterns were defined as predominantly focal or diffuse disease based on the median PPG value. The study was powered to ascertain the predictive capacity of PPG for optimal PCI results (defined as FFR≥0.88 after PCI) as assessed by the AUC. Immediate PCI outcomes were assessed using post-PCI FFR and CFR. Following PCI, biomarkers (troponin) were collected. An independent clinical events committee adjudicated periprocedural myocardial infarction. The assessment of peri-procedural myocardial infarction (MI) adhered to the criteria outlined in the 4th Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Target vessel failure (TVF) was defined as cardiac death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation. Results One thousand and four patients with 1057 vessels were included. The mean FFR was 0.68 ± 0.12, PPG 0.62 ± 0.17, post-PCI FFR 0.87 ± 0.07, and post-PCI CFR was 3.19 ± 1.93. PPG was significantly correlated with the change in FFR after PCI (r=0.65, 95% CI: 0.61-0.69, p<0.001) and showed an area under the curve of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.79-0.84) to predict optimal revascularisation. Suboptimal FFR (<0.88) after an angiographically successful PCI occurred in 471 vessels (53.5%) and was significantly higher in patients with diffuse disease (37.1% vs 74.0%, p<0.001). The change in CFR was sixfold higher in patients with high PPG (delta CFR focal 1.18 ± 1.94 and diffuse 0.19 ± 1.52, p<0.001). The rate of in-hospital TVF was similar between patients with focal vs diffuse disease (5.1% vs 8.5%, p=0.060). The incidence of periprocedural MI was significantly higher in patients with diffuse disease (5.9% vs 9.8%, p=0.050; OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.34). Conclusions Pathophysiological CAD patterns distinctly affect the safety and efficacy of PCI. PCI in focal disease was associated with improved physiological outcomes and a lower rate of periprocedural myocardial infarction compared to diffuse disease. Quantifying PPG before intervention reliably predicted post-PCI FFR. Further investigation through a randomised trial is warranted to explore the potential advantages of a PPG-guided PCI strategy.PPG and Revascularisation OutcomesPPG and FFR correlation Pre and Post-PCI

Physiological Distribution and Local Severity of Coronary Artery Disease and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

High-Risk Morphological and Physiological Coronary Disease Attributes As Outcome Markers after Medical Treatment and Revascularization.

Angiographic Findings and Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve

Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound for PCI.

Prognostic Implications of Plaque Characteristics and Stenosis Severity in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease.

Prognostic Implications of Prestent Pullback Pressure Gradient and Poststent Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Influence of Pathophysiologic Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease on Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.

Influence of pathophysiological patterns of coronary artery disease on the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Differential Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured After Coronary Stent Implantation by Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve– or Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Differential Prognostic Implications of Pre- and Post-Stent Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio–Derived Physiological 2-Dimensional Residual Disease Patterns After Stenting

2-Year Outcomes of Angiographic Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Coronary Interventions.

Differential Impact of Coronary Revascularization on Long-Term Clinical Outcome According to Coronary Flow Characteristics: Analysis of the International ILIAS Registry

Integrated coronary disease burden and patterns to discriminate vessels benefiting from percutaneous coronary intervention

Outcomes of Non-Ischaemic Coronary Lesions with High-Risk Plaque Characteristics on Coronary CT Angiography

Influence of Sex on Relationship Between Total Anatomical and Physiologic Disease Burdens and Their Prognostic Implications in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Impact of Post-PCI FFR Stratified by Coronary Artery