Comparison of Angiographic Success and Clinical Outcomes Based on Different Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Techniques
Sadam Hussain,Said Zaman,Muhammad Abbas Khan,Imran Khan,Malik Faisal Iftekhar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.69342
2024-09-13
Cureus
Abstract:Introduction Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the standard treatment for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Various PCI techniques exist, including balloon angioplasty, bare-metal stents (BMS), drug-eluting stents (DES), thrombus aspiration, direct stenting, rotational atherectomy (Rotablation), and cutting balloon angioplasty. Specific approaches for patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary artery disease may involve: 1) culprit vessel-only (CVO) primary PCI, 2) primary PCI followed by multivessel intervention of additional noninfarct lesions at the same procedure, or 3) CVO primary PCI followed by staged PCI of noninfarct lesions later during the index hospitalization or after discharge. However, their impact on angiographic success and clinical outcomes remains unclear. Methodology A retrospective study (n=90) evaluated the effectiveness of various PCI techniques during primary PCI. Data included demographics, clinical profiles, PCI strategies, and outcomes. Techniques such as thrombus aspiration, direct stenting, balloon angioplasty, and DES deployment were assessed. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were employed, with logistic regression for adjustment. Results The comparison of angiographic success and clinical outcomes based on different PCI strategies during primary PCI (n=90) revealed distinct differences. Successful procedures were associated with lower mean values for age (56.00 vs. 60.20), hypertension (165.50 vs. 170.30), weight (74.00 vs. 77.50), BMI, 26.80 vs. 28.70, KILLIP class (1.30 vs. 1.50), ejection fraction (45.80 vs. 47.90), creatinine (0.95 vs. 1.00), creatinine clearance (83.50 vs. 86.70), pulse rate (84.00 vs. 87.50), oxygen saturation (95.80 vs. 94.50), and blood sugar (170.00 vs. 182.00). Risk factors like hypertension (mean = 1.40 vs. 1.60), diabetes (mean = 1.60 vs. 1.70), and hyperlipidemia (mean = 1.85 vs. 1.95) also showed differences between successful and failed procedures. Significant variations were observed across PCI strategies for outcomes including angina within 30 days (Chi square = 18.75, p < 0.001), cerebrovascular accident (CVA, Chi square = 15.42, p = 0.001), acute left ventricular failure (LVF, Chi square = 12.67, p = 0.005), and cardiogenic shock (Chi square = 8.93, p = 0.029). Conclusion Patient demographics and clinical profiles influence PCI success. Techniques such as thrombus aspiration, direct stenting, balloon angioplasty, and DES have varied impacts on clinical outcomes. While conventional balloon angioplasty remains a viable option, newer techniques such as DES and mechanical thrombectomy demonstrate superior angiographic success rates and improved clinical outcomes, particularly in complex lesion subsets. However, the selection of PCI technique should be guided by careful consideration of patient-specific factors, lesion characteristics, and procedural feasibility.