Abstract:College students read chapters from a novel written by Alan Lightman (Einstein's Dreams) and later provided verification judgments on the truth/falsity of test statements. Each chapter described a different fictional village that incorporated assumptions about time that deviate from our normal TIME schema, e.g., citizens knowing exactly when the world will end, time flowing backward instead of forward. These novel assumptions about time provided interesting insights about life and reality. In two experiments, we examined whether readers could accurately incorporate these novel assumptions about time in the fictional story worlds, as manifested in the verification judgments for statements after story comprehension. The test statements included verbatim typical, verbatim atypical, inference typical, and inference atypical information from the perspective of mundane reality that meshes with a normal TIME schema. Verification ratings were collected on a 6-point scale in Experiment 1, whereas Experiment 2 used a signal-response technique in which binary true/false decisions were extracted at-.5, 1.5, 3.5, 5.5, and 10.0 s. The college students were measured on literary expertise, reading skill, working memory span, and reading time. Readers with comparatively high literary expertise showed truth discrimination scores that were compatible with a schema copy plus tag model, which assumes that readers are good at detecting and remembering atypical verbatim information; this model predicts better (and faster) truth discrimination for verbatim atypical statements than for verbatim typical statements. In contrast, fast readers with comparatively low literary expertise were compatible with a filtering model; this model predicts that readers gloss over (or suppress) atypical verbatim information and show advantages for verbatim typical information. All groups of readers had trouble inferentially propagating the novel assumptions about time in a fictional story world, but the slower readers were more accurate in their verification of the atypical inferences. A construction-integration model could explain the interactions among literary expertise, reading time, and the typicality of test statements.

Examining gullibility with sentence verification judgments

Linguistic Cues Facilitate Children’s Understanding of Belief-Reporting Sentences

Laypeople's beliefs about the effects of common estimator variables on memory

Are People Easily Duped by Disinformation? Experimental Evidence for Open Vigilance

Indeterminate and Enriched Propositions in Context Linger: Evidence From an Eye-Tracking False Memory Paradigm

Brain potentials during sentence verification: late negativity and long-term memory strength

Intensionality is more cognitively demanding than false belief in adults: evidence from a non-inferential sentence-reading task

How experts and novices judge other people's knowledgeability from language use

Can Language Models Be Tricked by Language Illusions? Easier with Syntax, Harder with Semantics

Verbal Perceptual Prompts Facilitate Children's Sensitivity to False Beliefs

Context Breeds False Memories for Indeterminate Sentences

The Curse of Knowledge in Reasoning About False Beliefs

GPT's Judgements Under Uncertainty

Effects of false statements on visual perception hinge on social suggestibility.

Automatic mental simulation in native and non-native speakers

Reality monitoring and metacognitive judgments in a false-memory paradigm

A Study on False Memory Induced by Misleading Information

Investigating belief understanding in children in a nonverbal ambiguous displacement and communication setting

More familiar, more credible? Distinguishing two types of familiarity on the truth effect using the drift-diffusion model

Why some children accept under-informative utterances

Verification of statements about story worlds that deviate from normal conceptions of time: what is true about Einstein's Dreams?