Abstract:A prominent theoretical framework spanning philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience holds that selective attention penetrates early stages of perceptual processing to alter the subjective visual experience of behaviorally relevant stimuli. For example, searching for a red apple at the grocery store might make the relevant color appear brighter and more saturated compared with seeing the exact same red apple while searching for a yellow banana. In contrast, recent proposals argue that data supporting attention-related changes in appearance reflect decision- and motor-level response biases without concurrent changes in perceptual experience. Here, we tested these accounts by evaluating attentional modulations of EEG responses recorded from male and female human subjects while they compared the perceived contrast of attended and unattended visual stimuli rendered at different levels of physical contrast. We found that attention enhanced the amplitude of the P1 component, an early evoked potential measured over visual cortex. A linking model based on signal detection theory suggests that response gain modulations of the P1 component track attention-induced changes in perceived contrast as measured with behavior. In contrast, attentional cues induced changes in the baseline amplitude of posterior alpha band oscillations (∼9-12 Hz), an effect that best accounts for cue-induced response biases, particularly when no stimuli are presented or when competing stimuli are similar and decisional uncertainty is high. The observation of dissociable neural markers that are linked to changes in subjective appearance and response bias supports a more unified theoretical account and demonstrates an approach to isolate subjective aspects of selective information processing.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Does attention alter visual appearance, or does it simply induce response bias? In the present study, we examined these competing accounts using EEG and linking models based on signal detection theory. We found that response gain modulations of the visually evoked P1 component best accounted for attention-induced changes in visual appearance. In contrast, cue-induced baseline shifts in alpha band activity better explained response biases. Together, these results suggest that attention concurrently impacts visual appearance and response bias, and that these processes can be experimentally isolated.

Effects of false statements on visual perception hinge on social suggestibility.

Social steerability modulates perceptual biases

A Study on False Memory Induced by Misleading Information

Perceived Causalities of Physical Events Are Influenced by Social Cues

Social cues help us construct the causal perception of physical events

Social norms shape visual appearance: Taking a closer look at the link between social norm learning and perceptual decision-making

Social Influence and Perceptual Decision Making

Long-term perceptual priors drive confidence bias which favors prior-congruent evidence

EEG reveals an early influence of social conformity on visual processing in group pressure situations

How Our Perception and Confidence Are Altered Using Decision Cues

The role of individual differences in visual\verbal information processing preferences in visual\verbal source monitoring

Post-decision biases reveal a self-consistency principle in perceptual inference

Shared and diverging neural dynamics underlying false and veridical perception

Verbal Perceptual Prompts Facilitate Children's Sensitivity to False Beliefs

Dissociable Neural Mechanisms Underlie the Effects of Attention on Visual Appearance and Response Bias

Does (Biasing) Nonverbal Information Deteriorate the Accuracy of the Take‐the‐Best Heuristic for Deception Detection?

Predictive cues elicit a liminal confirmation bias in the moral evaluation of real-world images

Hidden by bias: how standard psychophysical procedures conceal crucial aspects of peripheral visual appearance

Biased perception leads to biased action: Validating a Bayesian model of interception

Pupillary evidence reveals the influence of conceptual association on brightness perception

They’re watching you: the impact of social evaluation and anxiety on threat-related perceptual decision-making