Abstract:Repeated exposure to information increases its' perceived truth, and this illusory truth effect is often explained by two theoretical frameworks: the fluency account and the referential theory of truth. Whereas the fluency account suggests that prior activation of a single referent within a statement should increase its perceived truth, the referential theory makes no such predictions. The referential theory instead proposes that when a statement is processed, it activates the corresponding memory referents within that statement and strengthens the connection between these referents in the semantic memory network. Because repeated statements will have more coherent corresponding referents than new statements, they are perceived as relatively truer. Experiments 1 and 2 focused on testing the fluency account, with participants exposed to one or two of a statement's referents before evaluating that statement's truth. Experiments 3 and 4 focused on the referential theory by exposing participants to non-critical facts that linked together two of a critical statements' referents before evaluating the truth of the critical statements. We consistently observed a standard illusory truth effect, such that facts that repeated verbatim were rated as truer than new facts. However, perceived truth was not affected by prior exposure to the critical statement's topic (Experiment 1) or by prior exposure to non-critical facts related to the same topic(s) as the critical statement (Experiment 2). There was also no boost in perceived truth following prior exposure to non-critical facts that linked together two of the primary referents of the critical statement but did so in a semantically distinct manner from how those same referents were linked in the critical statement itself (Experiments 3 and 4). However, Experiment 4 demonstrated that perceived truth significantly increased if there was prior exposure to non-critical facts that linked two of the critical statement primary referents in a way that was semantically coherent with how those same referents were linked within the critical statement. Together, these results are consistent with the referential theory, and suggest that semantic consistency across repetitions plays a crucial role in leading to repetition-based illusory truth effects.

More familiar, more credible? Distinguishing two types of familiarity on the truth effect using the drift-diffusion model

Can Warnings Curb the Spread of Fake News? the Interplay Between Warning, Trust and Confirmation Bias

How explicit warnings reduce the truth effect: A multinomial modeling approach

The persuasive effects of social cues and source effects on misinformation susceptibility

The illusory certainty: Information repetition and impressions of truth enhance subjective confidence in validity judgments independently of the factual truth

Illusions of knowledge due to mere repetition

Why Do People Believe in Vaccine Misinformation? The Roles of Perceived Familiarity and Evidence Type

Source-credibility information and social norms improve truth discernment and reduce engagement with misinformation online

Don't believe them! Reducing misinformation influence through source discreditation

Debunking Three Myths About Misinformation

People underestimate the influence of repetition on truth judgments (and more so for themselves than for others)

Exposure to detectable inaccuracies makes children more diligent fact-checkers of novel claims

The illusory truth effect requires semantic coherence across repetitions

Investigating the Robustness of the Illusory Truth Effect Across Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Cognitive Style

Thinking more or thinking differently? Using drift-diffusion modeling to illuminate why accuracy prompts decrease misinformation sharing

Inoculation and accuracy prompting increase accuracy discernment in combination but not alone

Correcting vaccine misinformation: A failure to replicate familiarity or fear-driven backfire effects

Checking the Fact-Checkers: the Role of Source Type, Perceived Credibility, and Individual Differences in Fact-Checking Effectiveness

Double misinformation and eyewitness performance: An experimental replication

FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing us from Distinguishing True from False News

Enhancing misinformation correction: New variants and a combination of awareness training and counter-speech to mitigate belief perseverance bias