Abstract:Despite the remarkable success of Carnot’s heat engine cycle in founding the discipline of thermodynamics two centuries ago, false viewpoints of his use of the caloric theory in the cycle linger, limiting his legacy. An action revision of the Carnot cycle can correct this, showing that the heat flow powering external mechanical work is compensated internally with configurational changes in the thermodynamic or Gibbs potential of the working fluid, differing in each stage of the cycle quantified by Carnot as caloric. Action (@) is a property of state having the same physical dimensions as angular momentum (mrv = mr2ω). However, this property is scalar rather than vectorial, including a dimensionless phase angle (@ = mr2ωδφ). We have recently confirmed with atmospheric gases that their entropy is a logarithmic function of the relative vibrational, rotational, and translational action ratios with Planck’s quantum of action ħ. The Carnot principle shows that the maximum rate of work (puissance motrice) possible from the reversible cycle is controlled by the difference in temperature of the hot source and the cold sink: the colder the better. This temperature difference between the source and the sink also controls the isothermal variations of the Gibbs potential of the working fluid, which Carnot identified as reversible temperature-dependent but unequal caloric exchanges. Importantly, the engine’s inertia ensures that heat from work performed adiabatically in the expansion phase is all restored to the working fluid during the adiabatic recompression, less the net work performed. This allows both the energy and the thermodynamic potential to return to the same values at the beginning of each cycle, which is a point strongly emphasized by Carnot. Our action revision equates Carnot’s calorique, or the non-sensible heat later described by Clausius as ‘work-heat’, exclusively to negative Gibbs energy (−G) or quantum field energy. This action field complements the sensible energy or vis-viva heat as molecular kinetic motion, and its recognition should have significance for designing more efficient heat engines or better understanding of the heat engine powering the Earth’s climates.

Invalidity of prohibition of the perpetual motion engine of the second kind and the scenario of using these engines for prevention of the "thermal death" on the Earth

The Second Law: From Carnot to Thomson-Clausius, to the Theory of Exergy, and to the Entropy-Growth Potential Principle

Revisiting The Second Law of Energy Degradation and Entropy Generation: From Sadi Carnot's Ingenious Reasoning to Holistic Generalization

Reasoning and Logical-Proofs of the Fundamental Laws: 'No Hope' for the Challengers of the Second Law of Thermodynamics

Thermoelectric Cycle and the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

Dissipative heat engine is thermodynamically inconsistent

The Second Law and Entropy Misconceptions Demystified

Efficiency of cyclic devices working with non-Boltzmannian fluids: challenging the second principle of thermodynamics

A No-Go Theorem of Analytical Mechanics for the Second Law Violation

A Fallacious Argument in the Finite Time Thermodynamics Concept of Endoreversibility

Second Law of Thermodynamics without Einstein Relation

On the second law of thermodynamics: Spontaneous cold-to-hot heat transfer in a nonchaotic medium

Limits to Energy Conversion

Quantifiable Expression of The Second Law of Thermodynamics and It's Application

SYSTEM THAT INTERFERES WITH THE FIRST LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS

EconoThermodynamics, or the world economy "thermal death" paradox

Action and Entropy in Heat Engines: An Action Revision of the Carnot Cycle

Response To "Comment On 'A Fallacious Argument In The Finite Time Thermodynamics Concept Of Endoreversibility'" [J. Appl. Phys. 90, 6557 (2001)]

Sustainable Evolution in an Ever-Changing Environment: General Characterization

Efficiency bounds for nonequilibrium heat engines

Reply to Comment on 'The Law of Entropy Increase and the Meissner Effect'