Post-accession Compliance with the EU’s Anti-Corruption Conditions in the ‘Cooperation and Verification Mechanism’: Bite without Teeth?

Corina Lacatus,Ulrich Sedelmeier

Abstract:The Cooperation and Verification Mechanism (CVM) is a novel attempt by the European Union (EU) to compensate for the loss of sanctioning power against non-compliance after a state has joined the EU. The CVM extends monitoring after accession, but it cannot sanction non-compliance. Yet this paper suggests that it can nonetheless have an impact on compliance. We code the CVM reports’ assessment of compliance with its recommendations for the fight against corruption in Romania and Bulgaria. The results suggest that compliance in Romania has become surprisingly good. We suggest that these developments are due to institution-building: the creation of strong domestic anti-corruption institutions has created a powerful – yet fragile – institutional base for the fight against corruption. At the same time, these institutions remain vulnerable to attempts by the government and a cross-party coalition in parliament to limit their impact. The main role of the CVM has been as an international social constraint on efforts to obstruct these efforts, and as a focal point for societal mobilization against curbing the power of anti-corruption institutions. At the same time, compliance with the CVM does not directly translate into improvements of corruption in practice. While compliance with the CVM can create more favourable conditions for the improvement of corruption control, such improvements in practice require a central role of domestic civil society.

Political Science,Law