Corruption and Anti-Corruption Agencies in Eastern Europe and the CIS: a Practitioners’ Experience

Dan Dionisie,F. Checchi

Abstract:Corruption in the Eastern European and the CIS countries existed long before the process of transition and was rooted in the functions and structures of the communist system. Some of the characteristics of that system still have a bear on the degree and features of the corruption phenomenon in the region. With the fall of the Soviet Union and the beginning of the transition toward democracy and market economy, corruption became pervasive and acquired a large economic dimension. During the late nineties the countries of the region started introducing measures to fight corruption and creating anti-corruption agencies (ACAs). The paper will discuss these measures with particular focus on the reality of ACAs in the region in the context of the UN Convention Against Corruption. The main shortcomings of the anti-corruption systems and potential remedies will be analyzed from the perspective of UNDP's experience interacting with practitioners from ACAs in anti-corruption projects. This paper is based on the authors’ experience at the UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre, working with anti-corruption institutions in Eastern Europe. While the Regional Centre also covers the CIS, considering the specific dynamics of the countries in Central Asia and the focus of the conference, the paper will focus on the institutional arrangements for fighting corruption in the CIS neighbors of the EU and in the Western Balkans. The purpose is not to compare the situation of different countries since each reality must be analyzed individually, but to identify some of the dynamics that should be taken into consideration by the EU and other actors when proposing the introduction of anti-corruption measures in these countries. 1 Dan Dionisie is Public Administration Reform and Anti-corruption Policy Specialist at UNDP’s Bratislava Regional Centre. Francesco Checchi is the coordinator of the Anti-Corruption Practitioners’ Network, a UNDP regional project. 2 Disclaimer: the descriptions and statements contained in the paper reflect personal opinions and experiences of the authors or of practitioners working in anti-corruption institutions and are not to be considered official statements of UNDP.

Political Science