COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ANTI-CORRUPTION LEGISLATION OF UKRAINE AND EU COUNTRIES: IMPLEMENTATION AND ADAPTATION OF BEST PRACTICES

Maksym Komarov
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36994/2786-9008-2024-4-7
Abstract:The article provides a comparative analysis of the anti-corruption legislation of Ukraine and thecountries of the European Union in order to determine the best practices and the possibilities of their implementation in the Ukrainian legal system. The main anti-corruption mechanisms, including legislation, institutional structure and practical measures appliedin Poland, Romania and Germany, are considered. The main provisions of the Ukrainian anti-corruption legislation are analyzed, in particular the role and functions of the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU), the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption (NACP) and the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court (SAC). The main achievements and problems in the functioning of anti-corruption bodies in Ukraine have been identified. Special attention is paid to the comparison of the institutional structure, transparency and accountability of anti-corruption mechanisms, as well as the legislative framework of Ukraine and EU countries. The key challenges and prospects for the implementation of European practices in Ukraine are identified, including issues of political will, institutional capacity, and public support. Based on the analysis, recommendations were developed for improving Ukrainian anti-corruption legislation, strengthening the independence of anti-corruption bodies, and involving civil society in the fight against corruption. The article also contains suggestions for further research in this area.
Political Science,Law
What problem does this paper attempt to address?