Abstract:Social science theories often postulate causal relationships among a set of variables or events. Although directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) are increasingly used to represent these theories, their full potential has not yet been realized in practice. As non-parametric causal models, DAGs require no assumptions about the functional form of the hypothesized relationships. Nevertheless, to simplify the task of empirical evaluation, researchers tend to invoke such assumptions anyway, even though they are typically arbitrary and do not reflect any theoretical content or prior knowledge. Moreover, functional form assumptions can engender bias, whenever they fail to accurately capture the complexity of the causal system under investigation. In this article, we introduce causal-graphical normalizing flows (cGNFs), a novel approach to causal inference that leverages deep neural networks to empirically evaluate theories represented as DAGs. Unlike conventional approaches, cGNFs model the full joint distribution of the data according to a DAG supplied by the analyst, without relying on stringent assumptions about functional form. In this way, the method allows for flexible, semi-parametric estimation of any causal estimand that can be identified from the DAG, including total effects, conditional effects, direct and indirect effects, and path-specific effects. We illustrate the method with a reanalysis of Blau and Duncan's (1967) model of status attainment and Zhou's (2019) model of conditional versus controlled mobility. To facilitate adoption, we provide open-source software together with a series of online tutorials for implementing cGNFs. The article concludes with a discussion of current limitations and directions for future development.

Discovering Internal Validity Threats and Operational Concerns in Single-Case Experimental Designs Through Directed Acyclic Graphs

Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs

Measurement error and information bias in causal diagrams: mapping epidemiological concepts and graphical structures

How to develop causal directed acyclic graphs for observational health research: a scoping review

Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines

DAG With Omitted Objects Displayed (DAGWOOD): A framework for revealing causal assumptions in DAGs

Methodological Guidance for Single-Case Graph Construction in Counseling Outcome Research and Program Evaluation

[Application of directed acyclic graphs in identifying and controlling confounding bias].

Designing observational studies for credible causal inference in addiction research—Directed acyclic graphs, modified disjunctive cause criterion and target trial emulation

Synthesizing Subject-matter Expertise for Variable Selection in Causal Effect Estimation: A Case Study

Credible causal inference beyond toy models

Causal Graph Aided Causal Discovery in an Observational Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Study

Subset verification and search algorithms for causal DAGs

Deep Learning With DAGs

Adverse childhood experiences and adult outcomes using a causal framework perspective: Challenges and opportunities

Better Simulations for Validating Causal Discovery with the DAG-Adaptation of the Onion Method

Depicting deterministic variables within directed acyclic graphs (DAGs): An aid for identifying and interpreting causal effects involving derived variables and compositional data

Drawing and Analyzing Causal DAGs with DAGitty

Causal Inference in Educational Systems: A Graphical Modeling Approach

Rethinking animal attrition in preclinical research: Expressing causal mechanisms of selection bias using directed acyclic graphs

Forecasting Causal Effects of Interventions versus Predicting Future Outcomes