Abstract:In an effort to responsibly incorporate evidence based on single-case designs (SCDs) into the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) evidence base, the WWC assembled a panel of individuals with expertise in quantitative methods and SCD methodology to draft SCD standards. In this article, the panel provides an overview of the SCD standards recommended by the panel (henceforth referred to as the Standards) and adopted in Version 1.0 of the WWC’s official pilot standards. The Standards are sequentially applied to research studies that incorporate SCDs. The design standards focus on the methodological soundness of SCDs, whereby reviewers assign the categories of Meets Standards, Meets Standards With Reservations, and Does Not Meet Standards to each study. Evidence criteria focus on the credibility of the reported evidence, whereby the outcome measures that meet the design standards (with or without reservations) are examined by reviewers trained in visual analysis and categorized as demonstrating Strong Evidence, Moderate Evidence, or No Evidence. An illustration of an actual research application of the Standards is provided. Issues that the panel did not address are presented as priorities for future consideration. Implications for research and the evidence-based practice movement in psychology and education are discussed. The WWC’s Version 1.0 SCD standards are currently being piloted in systematic reviews conducted by the WWC. This document reflects the initial standards recommended by the authors as well as the underlying rationale for those standards. It should be noted that the WWC may revise the Version 1.0 standards based on the results of the pilot; future versions of the WWC standards can be found at http://www.whatworks.ed.gov .

Methodological Guidance for Single-Case Graph Construction in Counseling Outcome Research and Program Evaluation

A review of counseling research using single‐case research design

Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines

Discovering Internal Validity Threats and Operational Concerns in Single-Case Experimental Designs Through Directed Acyclic Graphs

A Preliminary Investigation on the Counseling Outcome Assessment Model

How Should We Determine Treatment Effectiveness with Single-Case Design Research for Participants with Autism Spectrum Disorder?

Single-World Intervention Graphs for Defining, Identifying, and Communicating Estimands in Clinical Trials

The Iterative Use of Single Case Research Designs to Advance the Science of EI/ECSE

Single-Case Design, Analysis, and Quality Assessment for Intervention Research

A Problem‐Solving Tool for Single‐Case Design Selection in Practice

Investigation of Two Preliminary Analysis-Altering Elements: Ordinate Scaling and DPPXYR

Designing observational studies for credible causal inference in addiction research—Directed acyclic graphs, modified disjunctive cause criterion and target trial emulation

Using interviewee‐created graphs to explore the arc of closeness and trust in adolescents' supportive relationships with nonparental adults

Single-case design meta-analyses in education and psychology: a systematic review of methodology

The Graph Rubric: Development of a Teaching, Learning, and Research Tool

Analyzing Two-Phase Single-Case Data with Non-overlap and Mean Difference Indices: Illustration, Software Tools, and Alternatives

The influence of procedural characteristics on within-case effect sizes for academic outcomes

Evaluating the Impact of Solution Focused Brief Therapy on Hope and Clinical Symptoms with Latine Clients

How to develop causal directed acyclic graphs for observational health research: a scoping review

Single-Case Intervention Research Design Standards

Assessing Clinical Significance: Proposed Extensions to Method