Abstract:We hypothesize that sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic relatedness influence the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). To test this hypothesis, we assessed MAG recovery in three in silico microbial communities composed of 42 species with the same richness but different sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic distribution profiles using three different pipelines for MAG recovery. The pipeline developed by Parks and colleagues (8K) generated the highest number of MAGs and the lowest number of true positives per community profile. The pipeline by Karst and colleagues (DT) showed the most accurate results (~ 92%), outperforming the 8K and Multi-Metagenome pipeline (MM) developed by Albertsen and collaborators. Sequencing depth influenced the accurate recovery of genomes when using the 8K and MM, even with contrasting patterns: the MM pipeline recovered more MAGs found in the original communities when employing sequencing depths up to 60 million reads, while the 8K recovered more true positives in communities sequenced above 60 million reads. DT showed the best species recovery from the same genus, even though close-related species have a low recovery rate in all pipelines. Our results highlight that more bins do not translate to the actual community composition and that sequencing depth plays a role in MAG recovery and increased community resolution. Even low MAG recovery error rates can significantly impact biological inferences. Our data indicates that the scientific community should curate their findings from MAG recovery, especially when asserting novel species or metabolic traits. Microbial communities are incredibly diverse and play essential roles in ecosystems, from recycling nutrients to influencing climate change. We explored how the microbial community assembly can influence its species' metagenomics recovery. Specifically, we examined how the abundance of different species within a sample, the extent of DNA sequencing (sequencing depth), and the species taxonomic relatedness affect our ability to accurately reconstruct these communities. We computationally simulated three microbial communities, each composed of 42 species. These communities varied in species abundance, sequencing depth, and how closely related the species were to each other. We then applied three different computational techniques to reconstruct the original communities from the simulated sequence data. Our findings highlight the critical impact of sequencing depth and taxonomical relatedness, specifically, on accurately recovering microbial genomes. Interestingly, more sequencing does not always equate to more accurate community representation. Moreover, even a few false positives can significantly distort our interpretations of microbial diversity and function. Our research underscores the importance of carefully considering these factors in metagenomic studies to avoid misleading conclusions about microbial ecosystems. Our work contributes to refining metagenomic techniques, aiming for a more reliable and nuanced understanding of microbial life's role in our planet's health and functioning.

MAGICIAN: MAG simulation for investigating criteria for bioinformatic analysis

MAGqual: a stand-alone pipeline to assess the quality of metagenome-assembled genomes

SEQ2MGS: an effective tool for generating realistic artificial metagenomes from the existing sequencing data

CheckM2: a rapid, scalable and accurate tool for assessing microbial genome quality using machine learning

Metagenome quality metrics and taxonomical annotation visualization through the integration of MAGFlow and BIgMAG

Advancing metagenome-assembled genome-based pathogen identification: unraveling the power of long-read assembly algorithms in Oxford Nanopore sequencing

Midi-metagenomics: A novel approach for cultivation independent microbial genome reconstruction from environmental samples

Simulation of 69 microbial communities indicates sequencing depth and false positives are major drivers of bias in prokaryotic metagenome-assembled genome recovery

A survey on computational strategies for genome-resolved gut metagenomics

METAGENOME ANALYSIS USING MEGAN

Binette: a fast and accurate bin refinement tool to construct high quality Metagenome Assembled Genomes

Critical assessment of pan-genomic analysis of metagenome-assembled genomes

Disentangle genus microdiversity within a complex microbial community by using a multi-distance long-read binning method: example of Candidatus Accumulibacter

DeepCheck: multitask learning aids in assessing microbial genome quality

Megan Analysis of Metagenomic Data

Highly accurate metagenome-assembled genomes from human gut microbiota using long-read assembly, binning, and consolidation methods

MAGUS: Multiple sequence Alignment using Graph clUStering

SMeta, a binning tool using single-cell sequences to aid in reconstructing species from metagenome accurately

Computational Methods for the Analysis of Tag Sequences in Metagenomics Studies.

Metamic: Reference-Free Misassembly Identification and Correction of De Novo Metagenomic Assemblies

MCSS: microbial community simulator based on structure