Abstract:We hypothesize that sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic relatedness influence the recovery of metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs). To test this hypothesis, we assessed MAG recovery in three in silico microbial communities composed of 42 species with the same richness but different sample species abundance, sequencing depth, and taxonomic distribution profiles using three different pipelines for MAG recovery. The pipeline developed by Parks and colleagues (8K) generated the highest number of MAGs and the lowest number of true positives per community profile. The pipeline by Karst and colleagues (DT) showed the most accurate results (~ 92%), outperforming the 8K and Multi-Metagenome pipeline (MM) developed by Albertsen and collaborators. Sequencing depth influenced the accurate recovery of genomes when using the 8K and MM, even with contrasting patterns: the MM pipeline recovered more MAGs found in the original communities when employing sequencing depths up to 60 million reads, while the 8K recovered more true positives in communities sequenced above 60 million reads. DT showed the best species recovery from the same genus, even though close-related species have a low recovery rate in all pipelines. Our results highlight that more bins do not translate to the actual community composition and that sequencing depth plays a role in MAG recovery and increased community resolution. Even low MAG recovery error rates can significantly impact biological inferences. Our data indicates that the scientific community should curate their findings from MAG recovery, especially when asserting novel species or metabolic traits. Microbial communities are incredibly diverse and play essential roles in ecosystems, from recycling nutrients to influencing climate change. We explored how the microbial community assembly can influence its species' metagenomics recovery. Specifically, we examined how the abundance of different species within a sample, the extent of DNA sequencing (sequencing depth), and the species taxonomic relatedness affect our ability to accurately reconstruct these communities. We computationally simulated three microbial communities, each composed of 42 species. These communities varied in species abundance, sequencing depth, and how closely related the species were to each other. We then applied three different computational techniques to reconstruct the original communities from the simulated sequence data. Our findings highlight the critical impact of sequencing depth and taxonomical relatedness, specifically, on accurately recovering microbial genomes. Interestingly, more sequencing does not always equate to more accurate community representation. Moreover, even a few false positives can significantly distort our interpretations of microbial diversity and function. Our research underscores the importance of carefully considering these factors in metagenomic studies to avoid misleading conclusions about microbial ecosystems. Our work contributes to refining metagenomic techniques, aiming for a more reliable and nuanced understanding of microbial life's role in our planet's health and functioning.

Disentangle genus microdiversity within a complex microbial community by using a multi-distance long-read binning method: example of Candidatus Accumulibacter

Highly accurate metagenome-assembled genomes from human gut microbiota using long-read assembly, binning, and consolidation methods

Charting the complexity of the activated sludge microbiome through a hybrid sequencing strategy

Midi-metagenomics: A novel approach for cultivation independent microbial genome reconstruction from environmental samples

CompostBin: A DNA composition-based algorithm for binning environmental shotgun reads

High-quality bacterial genomes of a partial-nitritation/anammox system by an iterative hybrid assembly method

Efficient High-Quality Metagenome Assembly from Long Accurate Reads using Minimizer-space de Bruijn Graphs

Simulation of 69 microbial communities indicates sequencing depth and false positives are major drivers of bias in prokaryotic metagenome-assembled genome recovery

Pacbio Long Reads Improve Metagenomic Assemblies, Gene Catalogs, And Genome Binning

New insights into functional divergence and adaptive evolution of uncultured bacteria in anammox community by complete genome-centric analysis

Exploring High-Quality Microbial Genomes by Assembling Short-Reads with Long-Range Connectivity

Recovery of complete genomes and non-chromosomal replicons from activated sludge enrichment microbial communities with long read metagenome sequencing

Advancing metagenome-assembled genome-based pathogen identification: unraveling the power of long-read assembly algorithms in Oxford Nanopore sequencing

Merging and concatenation of sequencing reads: a bioinformatics workflow for the comprehensive profiling of microbiome from amplicon data

Enhanced Recovery of Microbial Genes and Genomes From a Marine Water Column Using Long-Read Metagenomics

A multi-amplicon 16S rRNA sequencing and analysis method for improved taxonomic profiling of bacterial communities

Towards complete representation of bacterial contents in metagenomic samples

From gene to structure: Unraveling genomic dark matter in Ca. Accumulibacter

Recovery of genomes from metagenomes via a dereplication, aggregation and scoring strategy

Analysis Procedures for Assessing Recovery of High Quality, Complete, Closed Genomes from Nanopore Long Read Metagenome Sequencing

High-resolution Profiling of Bacterial and Fungal Communities using Pangenome-Informed Taxon-Specific Long-Read Amplicons