Comparison between ribosomal assembly and machine learning tools for microbial identification of organisms with different characteristics
Stephanie Chau,Carlos Rojas,Jorjeta G. Jetcheva,Mary Markart,Sudha Vijayakumar,Sophia Yuan,Vincent Stowbunenko,Amanda N. Shelton,William B. Andreopoulos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.30.510284
2024-01-30
Abstract:Genome assembly tools are used to reconstruct genomic sequences from raw sequencing data, which are then used for identifying the organisms present in a metagenomic sample. More recently, machine learning approaches have been applied to a variety of bioinformatics problems, and in this paper, we explore their use for organism identification. We start out by evaluating several commonly used metagenomic assembly tools, including PhyloFlash, MEGAHIT, MetaSPAdes, Kraken2, Mothur, UniCycler, and PathRacer, and compare them against state-of-the art deep learning-based machine learning classification approaches represented by DNABERT and DeLUCS, in the context of two synthetic mock community datasets. Our analysis focuses on determining whether ensembling metagenome assembly tools with machine learning tools has the potential to improve identification performance relative to using the tools individually. We find that this is indeed the case, and analyze the level of effectiveness of potential tool ensembling for organisms with different characteristics (based on factors such as repetitiveness, genome size, and GC content).
Bioinformatics