Effect of the Location of Tetanic Stimulation on Autonomic Responses: A Randomized Cross-Over Pilot Study
Pekka Talke,Isabel Talke
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/jpr.s443058
IF: 2.8319
2024-01-10
Journal of Pain Research
Abstract:Pekka Talke, 1 Isabel Talke 2 1 Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; 2 California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA, USA Correspondence: Pekka Talke, Email Background: Tetanic stimuli are used as standardized noxious inputs to investigate nociception. Previous studies have applied tetanic stimuli to various anatomical locations without validating that the resulting physiological responses were independent of the location where tetanic stimuli were applied. Our aim was to investigate the effects of three anatomical tetanic stimulus application sites on physiological variables reflecting autonomic nervous system responses as measured by photoplethysmography (PPG). Methods: Under general anesthesia, a five second, 100 hertz, 70 milliamp tetanic stimulus was applied to the ulnar nerve, medial side of the tibia, and thorax (T5 dermatome) (N=12). The effect of tetanic stimuli on PPG-derived variables (AC, DC, and ACDC) and pulse rate at each stimulus location was determined using repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Dunnett's post hoc test. Maximum tetanic stimulus-induced changes in PPG-derived variables and pulse rates were compared among the three stimulus locations using ANOVA. Results: AC and ACDC values of PPG decreased, and the DC values of PPG increased in response to tetanic stimuli-induced vasoconstriction at each location ( p < 0.001 for all). The maximum changes in the AC, ACDC, and DC values did not differ between locations ( p =NS). There were no significant changes in pulse rate ( p =NS). Conclusion: The results showed that tetanic stimulation at either of these three locations provides the same autonomic nervous system responses, as measured by PPG. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03648853. Plain Language Summary: We studied how pain medications and anesthetics reduce pain in humans. The amount of pain experienced by a person can be assessed by administering a slightly uncomfortable test, such as a small electric shock to the skin. These tests are often performed before and after administering a person's pain medication or anesthesia. It is not known if the test results change when an electric shock is applied to different areas of the body (eg, hand, leg, or chest). In this study, we applied small electric shocks to three areas of skin. We measured the participants' responses to this test using a special medical equipment (pulse oximeter), which tells us how the body reacts to an uncomfortable stimulus. We found that the test results were the same regardless of the area where the electric shock was applied. This information will be useful for investigators studying pain and pain management. Keywords: tetanic stimulus, antinociception, pain, anatomical location, photoplethysmography Surgery and painful intensive care unit (ICU) procedures elicit noxious stimuli that can cause hormonal, metabolic, and autonomic changes. 1,2 To attenuate the resulting physiological stress responses, clinicians use various pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions to optimize nociception-antinociception balance. 3–10 Noxious input is needed to assess nociception-antinociception balance. Unfortunately, naturally evoked nociception, such as surgical stimulation and painful ICU care procedures, can be unpredictable in intensity, duration, and timing of occurrence, complicating its use to quantify nociception-antinociception balance. To overcome this limitation, a tetanic stimulus has been used as a "standardized" noxious stimulus to study autonomic nervous system activation, antinociceptive therapies, and to evaluate performance of nociception monitors. 3–13 Previous studies have applied the tetanic stimulus to various anatomical locations (ulnar-, median- and sural nerve, thoracic, lumbar and cervical dermatomes, finger and the forearm) with no prior validation that the resulting physiological responses are independent of the tetanic stimulus location. 3–11,13–17 Thus, the aim of this pilot study was to investigate the effects of three anatomical tetanic stimulus application sites on physiological variables that reflect the autonomic nervous system responses. In a study, that confirmed to the Declaration of Helsinki, with approval of the University of California San Francisco Institutional Review Board (IRB# 18–25325, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03648853) and written informed consent we studied 12 patients between October 3, 2018 and November 30, 2018, who were scheduled for elective neurological surgery under general anesthesia and were over -Abstract Truncated-
clinical neurology