Abstract:Abstract Background and aims Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) is a well-established phenomenon and several protocols have shown acceptable between-subject reliability [based on intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values] in pain-free controls. Recently, it was recommended that future CPM test-retest reliability studies should explicitly report CPM reliability based on CPM responders and non-responders (within-subject reliability) based on measurement error of the test stimulus. Identification of reliable CPM paradigms based on responders and non-responders may be a step towards using CPM as a mechanistic marker in diagnosis and individualized pain management regimes. The primary aim of this paper is to investigate the frequency of CPM responders/non-responders, and to quantify the agreements in the classification of responders/non-responders between 2 different days for 10 different CPM protocols. Methods Data from a previous study investigating reliability of CPM protocols in healthy subjects was used. In 26 healthy men, the test-stimuli used on both days were: Pain thresholds to electrical stimulation, heat stimulation, manual algometry, and computer-controlled cuff algometry as well as pain tolerance to cuff algometry. Two different conditioning stimuli (CS; cold water immersion and a computer-controlled tourniquet) were used in a randomized and counterbalanced order in both sessions. CPM responders were defined as a larger increase in the test stimulus response during the CS than the standard error of measurement (SEM) for the test-stimuli between repeated baseline tests without CS. Results Frequency of responders and non-responders showed large variations across protocols. Across the studied CPM protocols, a large proportion (from 11.5 to 73.1%) of subjects was classified as CPM non-responders when the test stimuli standard error of measurements (SEM) was considered as classifier. The combination of manual pressure algometry and cold water immersion induced a CPM effect in most participants on both days ( n =16). However, agreement in the classification of CPM responders versus non-responders between days was only significant when assessed with computer-controlled pressure pain threshold as test-stimulus and tourniquet cuff as CS (κ=0.36 [95% CI, 0.04–0.68], p =0.037). Conclusions and implications Agreements in classification of CPM responders/non-responders using SEM as classifier between days were generally poor suggesting considerable intra-individual variation in CPM. The most reliable paradigm was computer-controlled pressure pain threshold as test-stimulus and tourniquet cuff as conditioning stimulus. However while this CPM protocol had the greatest degree of agreement of classification of CPM responders and non-responders across days, this protocol also failed to induce a CPM response in more than half of the sample. In contrast, the commonly used combination of manual pressure algometry and cold water immersion induced a CPM effect in most participants however it was inconsistent in doing so. Further exploration of the two paradigms and classification of responders and non-responders in a larger heterogeneous sample also including women would further inform the clinical usefulness of these CPM protocols. Future research in this area may be an important step towards using CPM as a mechanistic marker in diagnosis and in developing individualized pain management regimes.

Pain profiles and variability in temporal summation of pain and conditioned pain modulation in pain‐free individuals and patients with low back pain, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia

Topographic mapping of pain sensitivity of the lower back – a comparison of healthy controls and patients with chronic non-specific low back pain

Pain sensitivity as a correlate of clinical status in individuals with chronic low back pain

Subgrouping of facilitatory or inhibitory conditioned pain modulation responses in patients with chronic knee pain. Explorative analysis from a multicentre trial

A myriad of methods to determine temporal summation of pain in people with musculoskeletal pain and healthy participants: a scoping review

A study on variability of quantitative sensory testing in healthy participants and painful temporomandibular disorder patients.

Quantitative sensory testing, psychological factors, and quality of life as predictors of current and future pain in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Understanding inter-individual variability of experimental pain habituation and conditioned pain modulation in healthy individuals

Pain sensitization in fibromyalgia. Cross‐sectional associations between quantitative sensory testing of pain sensitization and fibromyalgia disease burden

Assessment of CPM reliability: quantification of the within-subject reliability of 10 different protocols

Reliability of conditioned pain modulation in healthy individuals and chronic pain patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Continuum of somatosensory profiles in breast cancer survivors with and without pain, compared to healthy controls and patients with fibromyalgia

Pain-related cognitions and emotional distress are not associated with conditioned pain modulation: an explorative analysis of 1142 participants with acute, subacute, and chronic pain

Reliability and minimal detectable change of dynamic temporal summation and conditioned pain modulation using a single experimental paradigm

Conditioned pain modulation, kinesiophobia, and pain catastrophizing as prognostic factors for chronicity in a population with acute low back pain: An exploratory prospective study

Psychological and pain profiles in persons with patellofemoral pain as the primary symptom

Cross-sectional and longitudinal analysis of conditioned pain modulation and pain in fibromyalgia: CPM as an effect modifier of pain changes over time

Quantitative somatosensory assessments in patients with persistent pain following groin hernia repair: A systematic review with a meta-analytical approach

Pain thresholds and intensities of CRPS type I and neuropathic pain in respect to sex

Associations between cognitive test scores and pain tolerance: The Tromsø study

Patients with neuropathic pain from lumbosacral radiculopathy demonstrate similar pressure pain thresholds and conditioned pain modulation to those with fibromyalgia