Abstract:Abstract Cap-and-trade regulation is a primary market-based mechanism for controlling carbon emissions. In this framework, governments allocate carbon permits to supply chain participants, which can be exchanged either within the supply chain or externally in the broader carbon market. This research employs a Stackelberg game model to examine a two-tier supply chain, including a single supplier and manufacturer. The study explores emission reduction strategies, notably considering the manufacturer’s capital limitations under cap-and-trade. Assuming the leading manufacturer holds surplus carbon permits and the upstream supplier experiences a shortage, we evaluate the dynamics of carbon trading within the supply chain. To facilitate emission reductions and alleviate the manufacturer’s capital constraints, the two parties engage in a cost-sharing contract and supplier financing mechanism. Our findings indicate that an increase in the impact coefficient of the emission reduction rate correlates with a rise in the internal carbon price, resulting in a decrease in the sales price. Under the cost-sharing model, a higher external carbon trading price boosts the carbon emission reduction rate for both parties. The manufacturer realizes optimal profit with the supplier financing model when external carbon prices are low. However, the cost-sharing contract proves more advantageous as prices increase. The preference among these mechanisms depends on the coefficient of the emission reduction rate on the internal carbon price.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the problem of how suppliers and manufacturers in a two - tier supply chain optimize emission reduction strategies under the cap - and - trade regulation. Specifically, the research focuses on the following points:
1. **Influence coefficient of internal carbon price**: Explore how the coefficient of the influence of the unit emission reduction rate on the internal carbon price affects the carbon pricing and selling price within the supply chain.
2. **External carbon trading price fluctuation**: Analyze how the fluctuation of the external carbon trading price affects the carbon emission reduction rates of suppliers and manufacturers under the cost - sharing framework.
3. **Optimal strategies under different external carbon prices and influence coefficients of emission reduction rates**: Under different external carbon prices and coefficients of the influence of the unit emission reduction rate on the internal carbon price, which emission reduction strategy can bring the highest profitability to the manufacturer.
### Main research background and motivation
With the growth of the economy, carbon emissions and pollution levels keep rising, and the government and regulatory agencies are paying increasing attention to environmental issues year by year. China has committed to achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 and reaching the peak of carbon emissions by 2030, which shows China's profound commitment to global climate change. In order to achieve these goals, the carbon emissions trading system is widely regarded as an important market mechanism for reducing carbon emissions.
### Research methods and models
This research adopts the Stackelberg game model and constructs a two - tier supply chain framework including a single supplier and a manufacturer. The research assumes that the manufacturer holds excessive carbon quotas, while the upstream supplier faces a shortage of carbon quotas. By introducing cost - sharing contracts and supplier financing mechanisms, the research explores how to optimize emission reduction strategies in the context of carbon emissions trading.
### Key assumptions
1. **Carbon quota allocation**: Under the carbon emissions trading regulation, suppliers and manufacturers are respectively allocated certain carbon quotas.
2. **Carbon emission reduction cost**: The carbon emission reduction cost is a convex function of the unit emission reduction rate \(C(r_i)=\frac{h_i r_i^2}{2}\), where \(h_i\) is the unit carbon emission reduction cost coefficient and \(r_i\) is the unit carbon emission reduction rate.
3. **Internal carbon price**: The internal carbon price \(p_2\) is proportional to the manufacturer's unit carbon emission reduction rate \(r_m\), that is, \(p_2 = \lambda r_m\), where \(\lambda\) is the influence coefficient of the manufacturer's emission reduction rate on the internal carbon price.
4. **Demand function**: The linear demand function of the product is \(q=\alpha - \beta p\), where \(\alpha\) is the potential market size and \(\beta\) is the sensitivity of the retail price.
### Research contributions
1. **Expand the external carbon trading market**: By introducing the carbon trading mechanism within the supply chain, the scope of the external carbon trading market is expanded.
2. **Cost - sharing contract**: Emphasize the role of cost - sharing contracts in promoting supply chain members to cooperate in emission reduction.
3. **Green credit financing**: Propose that suppliers can provide capital support to capital - constrained manufacturers through the green credit financing (GCF) mechanism to promote emission reduction.
### Conclusions
The research finds that the greater the influence coefficient of the unit emission reduction rate on the internal carbon price, the higher the internal carbon price and the lower the selling price. In the cost - sharing model, the increase in the external carbon trading price will increase the carbon emission reduction rates of both parties. When the external carbon price is low, the supplier financing model can enable the manufacturer to achieve the optimal profit; but as the external carbon price rises, the cost - sharing contract has more advantages. These findings help supply chain members to more effectively achieve carbon emission reduction goals, improve efficiency, reduce costs, and promote the atmosphere of cooperative emission reduction.