Low-Carbon supply chain optimisation with carbon emission reduction level and warranty period: nash bargaining fairness concern
Shuai LiShaojian QuM.I.M. WahabYing Jia School of Management Science and Engineering,Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,Nanjing,People's Republic of Chinab Research Institute for Risk Governance and Emergency Decision-Making,School of Management Science and Engineering,Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,Nanjing,People's Republic of Chinac Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD),Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,Nanjing,People's Republic of Chinad School of Economics and Management,Anhui Jianzhu University,Hefei,People's Republic of Chinae Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,Toronto Metropolitan University,Toronto,Canadaf School of Management,Shanghai University,Shanghai,People's Republic of ChinaShuai Li is a doctoral student at the School of Management Science and Engineering,Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,China. His research interests include Supply chain management,Sustainable operations,and Intelligent manufacturing.Shaojian Qu is a professor at the School of Management Science and Engineering,Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology,China. His research interests include Big data analytics,Robust optimisation,Decision theory and methods,Supply chain management,Portfolio,games,etc.M.I.M. Wahab is a professor at the Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering,Toronto Metropolitan University,Canada. His research interests include Real and financial options,Global supply chain design and risk hedging,Supply chain contract,Supply chain flexibility,New product introduction,etc.Ying Ji is a professor at the School of Management,Shanghai University,China. His research interests include Supply chain management,Logistics management,Engineering optimisation,Portfolio management,Group decision making,etc.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2333108
IF: 9.018
2024-03-26
International Journal of Production Research
Abstract:This study incorporates fairness concern in a low-carbon supply chain coordination mechanism where a single manufacturer sells its product to consumers through a single retailer. We develop four different scenarios of the Stackelberg master-slave game utility model—both members are neutral (NN), the manufacturer (FN) or retailer (NF) has fairness concern, and both are not neutral (FF), where the Nash bargaining fairness reference is leveraged to capture the impact of fairness preference on low-carbon supply chain optimisation decision-making profits, level of carbon emission reduction, warranty period, and revenue-sharing. Finally, numerical studies are conducted to quantify the impact of the Nash bargaining fairness concern. Research shows that: (1) fairness concern made it worse for the retailer but beneficial for the manufacturer and the system. (2) fairness concern causes a reduction in the level of carbon emission reduction and warranty period. However, the reduction of carbon emission reduction trading price and a certain range of revenue sharing effectively reduces the impact of fairness concern on members. (3) The revenue-sharing contract effectively reduces the negative impacts of fairness concern on supply chain members. The paper is a guide for enterprises development and cooperation but also provides empirical evidence for the government.
engineering, manufacturing, industrial,operations research & management science