Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of fairness concern on the optimal pricing, carbon emission reduction (CER), green marketing efforts (GME) and utility of supply chain members in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. First, three basic models that consider the manufacturer's different attitudes toward the retailer's fairness concern are constructed. The optimal decisions of these models are obtained. Second, these optimal solutions are compared, and the effects of some key parameters including fairness concern on the optimal decisions and utility are examined for the three models. Furthermore, the manufacturer may misestimate the retailer's fairness concern; therefore, an extended model is proposed. Design/methodology/approach The authors adopt the manufacturer-led Stackelberg game theoretic framework, where the manufacturer decides the wholesale price and CER level and, then, the retailer determines the retail price and GME. Findings The results show that fairness concern has a negative impact on the wholesale price, the level of CER and GME, and fairness concern are not always beneficial for maximizing utility, although it is related to whether the manufacturer pays attention to the retailer's fairness concern. The manufacturer will gain more utility when considering the fairness concern of retailers than non-consideration. Overestimating or underestimating the fairness concern of the retailers does not lead to benefits for the manufacturer. Research limitations/implications This study has the following two limitations that need to be addressed in future research. First, the authors only consider the fairness concern of a single retailer but not peer-induced fairness among multiple competing retailers, which can be taken into account in future studies. Second, the demand function is linearly related to price, CER and GME. Because of the uncertainty of market information, the uncertainty demand function can be further considered. Originality/value This paper simultaneously considers the factors CER, GME and fairness concern. The utility function of the retailer is established according to taking the Nash bargaining solution as a fairness reference point, and four different models are constructed and compared.

Differential Game Analysis of Carbon Emission Reduction Effect and Price Strategy Considering Government Intervention and Manufacturer Competition

Research on low-carbon strategies in supply chain with environmental regulations based on differential game

Optimizing emission reduction strategies in a two-echelon supply chain: a Stackelberg game perspective under cap-and-trade regulation

Game theoretic analysis of prices and low-carbon strategy considering dual-fairness concerns and different competitive behaviours

Stackelberg–Cournot dynamic game and risk management of heterogeneous supply chain enterprises under government carbon emission policy

Differential Game Analysis for Cooperation Models in Automotive Supply Chain under Low-Carbon Emission Reduction Policies

Government Participation in Supply Chain Low-Carbon Technology R&D and Green Marketing Strategy Optimization

Tripartite evolutionary game analysis of carbon emission reduction behavior strategies under government regulation

Carbon Emission Reduction Decisions of Supply Chain Differential Game Under Different Government Intervention Models

Differential game analysis of joint emission reduction decisions under mixed carbon policies and CEA

Game theoretical analysis of firms’ operational low-carbon strategy under various cap-and-trade mechanisms

The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition

Analyzing the influence of government policy on building carbon emission reduction based on differential game

Carbon emission reduction decisions of supply chain members under cap-and-trade regulations: A differential game analysis

Research on Carbon Cap Regulation, Retailer Altruistic Preferences, and Green Decision-Making of Manufacturing Enterprises

Differential Game Model for a Dual-Channel Supply Chain's Optimal Strategy under the Reference Carbon Emission Effect

Carbon emission reduction and green marketing decisions in a two-echelon low-carbon supply chain considering fairness concern

Emission Reduction Strategies of a Low-Carbon Supply Chain Considering Product Substitution and Government Subsidy

Effects of Government Regulations on Manufacturer's Behaviors under Carbon Emission Reduction.

Evolutionary game theoretic analysis on low-carbon strategy for supply chain enterprises

Tripartite evolutionary game analysis on corporate carbon reduction decisions considering dual supervision under carbon trading