Abstract:BackgroundMissed evidence-based monitoring in high-risk conditions (e.g., cancer) leads to delayed diagnosis. Current technological solutions fail to close this safety gap. In response, we aim to demonstrate a novel method to identify common vulnerabilities across clinics and generate attributes for context-flexible population-level monitoring solutions for widespread implementation to improve quality.MethodsBased on interviews with staff in otolaryngology, pulmonary, urology, breast, and gastroenterology clinics at a large urban publicly funded health system, we applied journey mapping to co-develop a visual representation of how patients are monitored for high-risk conditions. Using a National Academies framework and context-sensitivity theory, we identified common systems vulnerabilities and developed preliminary concepts for improving the robustness for monitoring patients with high-risk conditions (“design seeds” for potential solutions). Finally, we conducted a face validity and prioritization assessment of the design seeds with the original interviewees.ResultsWe identified five high-risk situations for potentially consequential diagnostic delays arising from suboptimal patient monitoring. All situations related to detection of cancer (head and neck, lung, prostate, breast, and colorectal). With clinic participants we created 5 journey maps, each representing specialty clinic workflow directed at evidence-based monitoring. System vulnerabilities common to the different clinics included challenges with: data systems, communications handoffs, population-level tracking, and patient activities. Clinic staff ranked 13 design seeds (e.g., keep patient list up to date, use triggered notifications) addressing these vulnerabilities. Each design seed has unique evaluation criteria for the usefulness of potential solutions developed from the seed.ConclusionsWe identified and ranked 13 design seeds that characterize situations that clinicians described ‘wake them up at night’, and thus could reduce their anxiety, save time, and improve monitoring of high-risk patients. We anticipate that the design seed approach promotes robust and context-sensitive solutions to safety and quality problems because it provides a human-centered link between the experienced problem and various solutions that can be tested for viability. The study also demonstrates a novel integration of industrial and human factors methods (journey mapping, process tracing and design seeds) linked to implementation theory for use in designing interventions that anticipate and reduce implementation challenges.

Adapting and testing measures of organizational context in primary care clinics in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Pragmatic adaptation of implementation research measures for a novel context and multiple professional roles: a factor analysis study

Adapting the primary care assessment tool for sub-saharan Africa

How does the external context affect an implementation processes? A qualitative study investigating the impact of macro-level variables on the implementation of goal-oriented primary care

A Multisite Health System Survey to Assess Organizational Context to Support Evidence-Based Practice

Community translation in the context of the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of patient reported outcome measures: a South African perspective

Whole-system change: case study of factors facilitating early implementation of a primary health care reform in a South African province

Implementation leadership and implementation climate in context: A single organization intrinsic case study for implementation of digital measurement-based care

Cross-cultural adaptation of an anxiety measure in a disadvantaged South African community context: Methodological processes and findings

Implementing an intervention to improve leadership/management of public healthcare services in the Free State Province, South Africa: lessons learned

The role of context in implementation research for non-communicable diseases: Answering the 'how-to' dilemma

A framework for implementation of community-orientated primary care in the Metro Health Services, Cape Town, South Africa

Conducting health survey research in a deep rural South African community: challenges and adaptive strategies

A learning health systems approach to scaling up an evidence-based intervention for integrated primary mental healthcare case finding and referral in South Africa

Measuring Organizational Culture in Ethiopia's Primary Care System: Validation of a Practical Survey Tool for Managers

Results of an Integrative Analysis: A Call for Contextualizing HIV and AIDS Clinical Practice Guidelines to Support Evidence-Based Practice

Tailoring an intervention to the context and system redesign related to the intervention: A case study of implementing shared medical appointments for diabetes

Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Implementation science for ambulatory care safety: a novel method to develop context-sensitive interventions to reduce quality gaps in monitoring high-risk patients

Context-based factors that influence healthcare information system implementation in resource-constrained public hospitals

Contextual factors influencing implementation of HIV treatment support strategies for female sex workers living with HIV in South Africa: A qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research