Factors facilitating the implementation of a clinical decision support system in primary care practices: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis
Alexandra Piotrowski,Jana Coenen,Christian Rupietta,Jale Basten,Christiane Muth,Sara Söling,Viola Zimmer,Ute Karbach,Petra Kellermann-Mühlhoff,Juliane Köberlein-Neu,AdAM study group,Marjan van den Akker,Till Beckmann,Benjamin Brandt,Robin Brünn,Kiran Chapidi,Truc Sophia Dinh,Lara Düvel,Benno Flaig,Mathias Flume,Ferdinand M Gerlach,Paul Glasziou,Ana Isabel Gonzalez-Gonzalez,Daniel Grandt,Simone Grandt,Wolfgang Greiner,Reinhard Hammerschmidt,Sebastian Harder,Peter Ihle,Julia Jachmich,Renate Klaaßen-Mielke,Eva Leicher,Dorothea Lemke,Frank Meyer,Ingo Meyer,Beate S Müller,Thomas Müller,Rafael Perera,Holger Pfaff,Johanna Richard,Bastian Surmann,Nina Timmesfeld,Hans J Trampisch
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-10156-9
2023-10-26
Abstract:Background: Understanding how to implement innovations in primary care practices is key to improve primary health care. Aiming to contribute to this understanding, we investigate the implementation of a clinical decision support system (CDSS) as part of the innovation fund project AdAM (01NVF16006). Originating from complexity theory, the practice change and development model (PCD) proposes several interdependent factors that enable organizational-level change and thus accounts for the complex settings of primary care practices. Leveraging the PCD, we seek to answer the following research questions: Which combinations of internal and external factors based on the PCD contribute to successful implementation in primary care practices? Given these results, how can implementation in the primary care setting be improved? Methods: We analyzed the joint contributions of internal and external factors on implementation success using qualitative comparative analysis (QCA). QCA is a set-theoretic approach that allows to identify configurations of multiple factors that lead to one outcome (here: successful implementation of a CDSS in primary care practices). Using survey data, we conducted our analysis based on a sample of 224 primary care practices. Results: We identified two configurations of internal and external factors that likewise enable successful implementation. The first configuration enables implementation based on a combination of Strong Inside Motivation, High Capability for Development, and Strong Outside Motivation; the second configuration based on a combination of Strong Inside Motivators, Many Options for Development and the absence of High Capability for Development. Conclusion: In line with the PCD, our results demonstrate the importance of the combination of internal and external factors for implementation outcomes. Moreover, the two identified configurations show that different ways exist to achieve successful implementation in primary care practices. Trial registration: AdAM was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT03430336 ) on February 6, 2018.