Abstract:Paulo Cruchinho, 1 María Dolores López-Franco, 2 Manuel Luís Capelas, 3 Sofia Almeida, 4 Phillippa May Bennett, 5– 7 Marcelle Miranda da Silva, 1, 8 Gisela Teixeira, 1 Elisabete Nunes, 1 Pedro Lucas, 1 Filomena Gaspar 1 On Behalf of the Handovers4SafeCare 1 Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Center (CIDNUR) of Lisbon, Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 2 CTS-464 Nursing and Innovation in Healthcare, University of Jaén, Jaén, Spain; 3 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Lisboa, Portugal; 4 Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Faculty of Health Sciences and Nursing, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Health (CIIS), Porto, Portugal; 5 Center for English, Translation, and Anglo-Portuguese Studies (CETAPS), Lisboa, Portugal; 6 Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities of the New University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal; 7 Faculty of Arts and Humanities of the University of Coimbra, Department of Languages, Literatures and Cultures, Coimbra, Portugal; 8 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Anna Nery Nursing School, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil Correspondence: Paulo Cruchinho, Nursing School of Lisbon, Avenida Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, 1600-190, Portugal, Tel +351 217913400, Email Cross-cultural validation of self-reported measurement instruments for research is a long and complex process, which involves specific risks of bias that could affect the research process and results. Furthermore, it requires researchers to have a wide range of technical knowledge about the translation, adaptation and pre-test aspects, their purposes and options, about the different psychometric properties, and the required evidence for their assessment and knowledge about the quantitative data processing and analysis using statistical software. This article aimed: 1) identify all guidelines and recommendations for translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation within the healthcare sciences; 2) describe the methodological approaches established in these guidelines for conducting translation, adaptation, and cross-cultural validation; and 3) provide a practical guideline featuring various methodological options for novice researchers involved in translating, adapting, and validating measurement instruments. Forty-two guidelines on translation, adaptation, or cross-cultural validation of measurement instruments were obtained from "CINAHL with Full Text" (via EBSCO) and "MEDLINE with Full Text". A content analysis was conducted to identify the similarities and differences in the methodological approaches recommended. Bases on these similarities and differences, we proposed an eight-step guideline that includes: a) forward translation; 2) synthesis of translations; 3) back translation; 4) harmonization; 5) pre-testing; 6) field testing; 7) psychometric validation, and 8) analysis of psychometric properties. It is a practical guideline because it provides extensive and comprehensive information on the methodological approaches available to researchers. This is the first methodological literature review carried out in the healthcare sciences regarding the methodological approaches recommended by existing guidelines. Keywords: cross-cultural comparison, decision-making, psychometric properties, research design, validation studies, health services research Healthcare research requires the use of cross-culturally validated instruments to measure implementation of healthcare interventions and their outcomes through quantitative comparisons over time and across organizations. 1–4 The use of data obtained through culturally adapted evaluation instruments allows researchers, policymakers, managers and, health professionals to gain a more analytical view of the phenomena under study and to develop internationally accepted and recognized theories on the provision of patient care, based on the comparison of local data with broader data. 5 This approach also facilitates the identification of factors contributing to the effectiveness of healthcare intervention programs, 6 or other forms of Outcomes Research. This type of quantitative research, focused on the quality of healthcare provision, requires valid and reliable measuring instruments, 7 obtained through cross-cultural validation studies. These studies aim to confirm the capacity of measurement instruments developed in one culture to produce meaningful results when applied in another culture. 8 Measurement instruments can include questionnaires, tests, rating scales and self-reports, 9 the latter being also known as Patient-Reporte -Abstract Truncated-

Community translation in the context of the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of patient reported outcome measures: a South African perspective

Cross-cultural adaptation of an anxiety measure in a disadvantaged South African community context: Methodological processes and findings

A Xhosa language translation of the CORE-OM using South African university student samples

Development of three African language translations of the FACT-G

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of three implementation measures into Brazilian-Portuguese

Evaluating the validity and reliability of the Tswana adaptation of the MOS-HIV tool for health-related quality of life among HIV Sub-populations in Botswana: A study protocol

Understanding the Social Dimensions and Context in HIV Research: Instrument Adaptation Is More Than Just Translation

Translation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the SOSG-OQ 2.0 Questionnaire into Brazilian Portuguese

Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Convergent Validity of Occupational Self-Assessment for Brazilian Portuguese

Cross-cultural adaptation, face validity and reliability of the Model of Human Occupation Screening Tool to Brazilian Portuguese

TRANSLATION AND TRANSCULTURAL ADAPTATION OF THE PATIENT MEASURE OF SAFETY (PMOS) QUESTIONNAIRE TO BRAZILIAN PORTUGUESE

Translation and Cultural Adaptation into Arabic of Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System® Item Banks: Cognitive Function Abilities and Physical Function for Samples with Mobility Aid Users

Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines

Brazilian Portuguese translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the “Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disabilities” (CPCHILD©) questionnaire

Cross-Culturally Adapted Versions of Patient Reported Outcome Measures for the Lower Extremity

Community perceptions of community health worker effectiveness: Contributions to health behaviour change in an urban health district in South Africa

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers

Adapting and testing measures of organizational context in primary care clinics in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa

Healthcare transition practices of occupational therapists in South African public healthcare

Transcultural adaptation and psychometric study of the French version of the nursing home survey on patient safety culture questionnaire

Cultural adaptation of a pediatric functional assessment for rehabilitation outcomes research