The disparate impacts of college admissions policies on Asian American applicants

Joshua Grossman,Sabina Tomkins,Lindsay Page,Sharad Goel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55119-0
IF: 4.6
2024-02-24
Scientific Reports
Abstract:There is debate over whether Asian American students face additional barriers, relative to white students, when applying to selective colleges. Here we present the results from analyzing 685,709 applications submitted over five application cycles to 11 highly selective colleges (the "Ivy-11"). We estimate that Asian American applicants had 28% lower odds of ultimately attending an Ivy-11 school than white applicants with similar academic and extracurricular qualifications. The gap was particularly pronounced for students of South Asian descent (49% lower odds). Given the high yield rates and competitive financial aid policies of the schools we consider, the disparity in attendance rates is likely driven, at least in part, by admissions decisions. In particular, we offer evidence that this pattern stems from two factors. First, many selective colleges give preference to the children of alumni in admissions. We find that white applicants were substantially more likely to have such legacy status than Asian applicants. Second, we identify geographic disparities potentially reflective of admissions policies that disadvantage students from certain regions of the United States. We hope these results inform discussions on equity in higher education.
multidisciplinary sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problems that this paper attempts to solve are: whether there are additional barriers for Asian - American applicants in the admission process of top universities in the United States, and compared with white students, what these barriers are specifically reflected in. Through the analysis of 685,709 applications submitted to the "Ivy - 11", the research aims to quantify the difference in the probability of Asian - American students being finally admitted by these schools compared with white students with similar backgrounds. The research specifically focuses on students with South Asian backgrounds and explores possible reasons for these differences, such as legacy status and differences in regional distribution. Through this research, the author hopes to provide data support and new perspectives for the discussion of the fairness of higher education.