Abstract:As one of the important reforms on the college admission, the Independent Freshman Admission Program (IFAP) has received wide attention since its implementation. Although there has been much discussion that IFAP has excerbated inequity in allocating educational opportunities, there is still a lack of empirical evidence as to whether or not such inequality is a necessary tradeoff to the recruitment of students with special talents. This article analzyes the subsample data of three national elite universities (Peking University, Tsinghua University, and Renmin University of China) from the Beijing College Student Panel Survey (BCSPS) to examine the consequence of the IFAP program in educational equity and outcomes, paying special attention to the heterogeneity of students recruited through the IFAP. We divide these students into two subgroups: those who could pass the entrance exam even without IFAP, and those who could be admitted only through the IFAP, and compare them to those who enter college through the competitive College Entrance Examination (gaokao). Results show that, the IFAP is socially stratified, and students selected by the IFAP more likely come from urban families, with college-educated parents, and graduated from key-point high schools. On the other hand, there is no significant difference between students selected through the IFAP and through regular gaokao in academic performance, social activities, non-cognitive skills, career planning and job placements after graduation. The implications of these findings for the reform on admission policies and procedures are discussed.

The Disadvantaged Students under Preferential Enrollment Policies:Entrance Opportunities and Educational Equity——Evidence from a Key University

Preferential policies for ethnic minority students in China's college/university admission

The Effect of a National Education Policy on Language Test Performance: a Fairness Perspective

An Empirical Study of Independent Admission Policy of Higher Education Institution:Based on the perspectives of fairness and efficiency

Urban/Rural Disparities in Access to Elite Higher Education: The Case of Tsinghua University

New Thoughts on Preferential Policy for Ethnic Minority Students in College Entrance Examination in China

Independent Freshman Admission Program (IFAP) in China’s Higher Education: Evidence from Three National Elite Universities in Beijing

Are Opportunities to Equalize Elite High Schools Discriminatory? Evidence from a Quasi-Experimental Design

Probe into the Optimization of Enrollment Policy in Chinese Minority Higher Education

Equity and Access to Higher Education in China: Lessons from Hunan Province for University Admissions Policy

Independent Freshman Admission And Educational Inequality In The Access To Elite Higher Education Evidence From Peking University

Can China’s Higher Education Expansion Reduce the Educational Inequality Between Urban and Rural Areas?

The Evolution of Ethnic Preferential Policies in the 21st Century

Unequal Access to College in China: How Far Have Poor, Rural Students Been Left Behind?

China’s Higher Education Expansion and Its Impact on Equality in Educational Opportunity

City Administrative Level and Tertiary Educational Opportunities: Evidence from China's Higher Education Expansion Policy

The Expansion and Improvement of Student Assistance in China

The Elite Exclusion: Stratified Access and Production During the Chinese Higher Education Expansion

Influence of family resources on educational equity against the background of college enrollment expansion

A Comparative Study of Educational Opportunities for Disadvantaged Children in China and The United States--Taking Disadvantaged Children of Ethnic Minorities in The Two Countries as An Example

Intergenerational Educational Inequality and Its Transmission in China's Elite Universities