Abstract:Abstract Background Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency (RF) or cryoballoon (CB) has been an established treatment for atrial fibrillation. PVI using RF is the most common method with a rather complex technique of a point-by-point tissue heating and navigation of electro-anatomical-guided mapping system, and PVI with CB is also the common method with a relatively simple technique of freezing balloon occlusion. These 2 types of ablation are comparable in terms of the efficacy of the PVI procedure. Purpose The data on the clinical outcome of each AF type with PV triggers has been limited. We compared the outcome of success rate between RF and CB group with respect to each AF type, and further assessed the efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation for AF patients with the origin of only PV. Methods A total of 3402 AF patients (age 64±11; 2463 males) underwent initial PVI from May 2009 to July 2018 (PAF: 67%, non-PAF: 37%). Radiofrequency using irrigation-tip catheter was employed to 1796 patients since May 2009 (RF-PAF: 55%, RF-non-PAF: 45%). Second-generation cryoballoon was employed to other 1606 patients since September 2014 (CB-PAF: 81%, CB-non-PAF: 19%). In CB group, PV touch-up ablation with RF was needed for 113 patients (7%) (CB-PAF: 6%, CB-non-PAF: 13%; p<0.001). After PVI, additional ablation for non-PV foci was undergone after the induction by using isoproterenol infusion and rapid atrial pacing (RF-AF: 34%, CB-AF: 32%; p=0.107). Results In all PAF patients, AF free survival rate was significantly superior in CB group (2-years Kaplan-Meir event rate, CB 83.2%, RF 75.2%; log-rank p<0.001). The percentage of patients with non-PV foci was almost equivalent in both group (CB 30%, RF 31%, p=0.644). And in PAF patients with only PV-foci, AF free survival rate was significantly superior in CB group (2-years Kaplan-Meir event rate, CB 85.0%, RF 78.8%; log-rank p<0.001). On the other hand, in all non-PAF patients, AF free survival rate was almost equivalent in both non-PAF group (2-years Kaplan-Meir event rate, CB 65.5%, RF-non-PAF 70.0%; log-rank p=0.9). The percentage of patients with non-PV foci was almost equivalent in both group (CB 40%, RF 39%, p=0.731), And in non-PAF patients with only PV-foci, AF free survival rate was almost equivalent in both non-PAF group (2-years Kaplan-Meir event rate, CB 69.7%, RF 73.0%; log-rank p=0.376). Conclusions Our study showed better outcome of PVI with CB for PAF patients with PV triggers, and indicated the non-inferiority of PVI with CB for non-PAF patients with PV triggers to PVI with RF.

Comparison of Post-procedural P-wave Vector Magnitude on 12-Lead Electrocardiogram between Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Ablation

Intraprocedural Endpoints To Predict Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Randomized Trial Of Four Post-Ablation Techniques

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Older Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

P1918Comparison of the clinical outcome of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein triggers

Efficacy of Ablation Index-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study

Evaluation of Isolation Area, Myocardial Injury and Left Atrial Function Following High-Power Short-Duration Radiofrequency or Second-Generation Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

VP122 Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Impact of altered pulmonary vein anatomy on long-term outcomes after cryoablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation with Vs Without Additional Low-Voltage-Area Ablation in Older Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Correlation Analysis of Pulmonary Vein Anatomy and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence after Cryoballoon Ablation

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Comparative analysis of recurrence predictors and outcomes for atrial tachyarrhythmia following atrial fibrillation ablation: high-power short-duration vs. conventional pulmonary vein isolation

Comparison of Using Second-Generation Cryoballoon and Radiofrequency Catheter for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation in Patients With the Common Ostium of Inferior Pulmonary Veins

A Simplified Approach to Pulmonary Vein Visualization during Cryoballoon Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation

Meta-analysis of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Thermal Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF: A Broad Overview Focusing on Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes

Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Versus Cryoballoon for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results From a Prospective Comparative Study

Pulsed Field Versus Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Follow-Up in a 400-Patient Cohort

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: Lessons from repeat procedures

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of high-power vs. conventional-power radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation