Abstract:Background Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a relatively new non-thermal form of ablation employing irreversible cell electroporation as an alternative to radio-frequency ablation. Conventional use of PFA relies on fluoroscopy. Electro-anatomical and voltages mapping (EAM) may potentially provide refinement of PFA via ablation of non-PV targets and accurate localisation of catheter placement. Currently there is limited data on the efficacy of the use of voltages criteria of EAM in conjunction PFA in the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Objective The aim of our study was to determine the effect on atrial arrhythmia recurrence with the use of EAM with PFA in patients requiring atrial fibrillation ablation. Methods This single centre retrospective observational analysis included one hundred patients with symptomatic AF (paroxysmal and persistent) undergoing ablation for the first time. Fifty patients underwent PFA-PVI alone and fifty patients underwent PFA-PVI with EAM. Data were obtained on patient characteristics, outcomes, procedure details and complications up to one year. A blanking period of three months was used post-ablation. For rhythm monitoring we utilised ECGs and holters at three, six, nine and twelve months and twenty-four hour holter monitoring at six and nine months. We also used remote monitoring in between these periods to record any symptomatic episodes atrial arrhythmias. Results Baseline patient characteristics are represented in Table 1. Despite having no significant difference in category of AF between groups (Paroxysmal, persistent, longstanding persistent) the mapping group were significantly older (68.2 years ± 10.2 vs 60.1 ± 11.11; p=0.01), longer duration of documented atrial fibrillation (45.9 ± 50 vs 28.6 ± 38 months; p=0.038), higher risk for CV events with CHA2DS2-VASc score (2.2 ± 1.5 vs 1.42 ± 1.2; p=0.04), however, procedure times were greater in the PVI and mapping group (72.8 ± 6.2 vs 41.1 ± 17 minutes; p=0.03). Successful PVI was achieved acutely in all patients upon voltage guided mapping validation and most importantly 1 year follow up revealed comparable outcome in both groups (Fig 1). Conclusion Patients who underwent PFA with mapping were older, greater co-morbidity and longer duration of AF burden. Yet, the addition of EAM with PFA did demonstrate equivalent achievement of sinus rhythm and was relatively high as higher than 80 % at one year follow up. This study may suggest a preference to using EAM in patients who may be deemed to be older and have a greater co-morbidity. It emerges as a great hope to safer approach and successful intervention to reduce AF burden.mapping vs PVI onlyGraph showing one year follow up

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Intraprocedural Endpoints To Predict Durable Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Randomized Trial Of Four Post-Ablation Techniques

Pulsed electric field, cryoballoon, and radiofrequency for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation: a propensity score-matched comparison

Efficacy of Ablation Index-Guided Pulmonary Vein Isolation in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation.

Efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation with pulsed field ablation vs. novel cryoballoon ablation system for atrial fibrillation

Pulsed Field Versus Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation: Efficacy, Safety, and Long-Term Follow-Up in a 400-Patient Cohort

Efficacy and safety of pulsed field ablation compared to cryoballoon ablation in the treatment of atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

Pulsed field versus cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation: a real-world observational study on procedural outcomes and efficacy

Pulmonary vein isolation using pulsed field ablation vs. high-power short-duration radiofrequency ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: efficacy, safety, and long-term follow-up (PRIORI study)

Pentaspline Pulsed Field Ablation Catheter Versus Cryoballoon for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Results From a Prospective Comparative Study

Comparison of pulsed field ablation versus cryoballon and radiofrequency ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients with heart failure

Comparison of pulmonary vein isolation using cryoballoon, high-power short-duration, and conventional radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-weighted study

Long-term outcomes of a time to isolation - based strategy for cryoballoon ablation compared to radiofrequency ablation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon-based pulmonary vein isolation: Lessons from repeat procedures

P1918Comparison of the clinical outcome of pulmonary vein isolation with cryoballoon and radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation with pulmonary vein triggers

Pulsed-field ablation-based pulmonary vein isolation: acute safety, efficacy and short-term follow-up in a multi-center real world scenario

Safety and effectiveness of pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation patients: a single centre experience

Recurrences after Pulsed Field Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Incidence, Mechanisms, Predictors, and Comparison with Thermal Energy

Meta-analysis of Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Thermal Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation in AF: A Broad Overview Focusing on Efficacy, Safety and Outcomes

Pulsed field ablation using additional mapping and substrate modification to treat atrial fibrillation - one year outcome comparison

Pulsed-field ablation versus thermal ablation for atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis.