Comparing imaging modalities in the assessment of fibrosis in metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease

Naseem Ravanbakhsh,Debra Browne,Carly Weaver,Asal Gholikhani,Patil Kavarian,Tania Mitsinikos
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jpn3.12368
2024-09-19
Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
Abstract:Background Metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is the most common liver disease in children. Liver biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis. Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and transient elastography (TE) are imaging modalities that can monitor fibrosis and steatosis noninvasively. More studies are needed to identify whether imaging modalities can provide accurate and reproducible data. We hypothesize that MRE provides reliable data similar to that of TE when compared to liver biopsy in children with MASLD/metabolic dysfunction‐associated steatohepatitis. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of children with liver biopsy‐proven MASLD at Children's Hospital Los Angeles between September 2017 and January 2023, investigating and comparing the predictive accuracy of MRE and TE in the detection of high‐grade fibrosis on liver biopsy. Results Seventy‐seven patients were reviewed, all of whom had undergone liver biopsy, MRE and TE for evaluation of MASLD. Fibrosis was identified in 90% of liver biopsies. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROC) of MRE and TE for detection of high‐grade fibrosis were 0.817 and 0.750, respectively, and not significantly different (p = 0.4785). Conclusion We demonstrate that MRE and TE did not accurately predict high‐grade fibrosis on liver biopsy. Between the two noninvasive imaging modalities, the correlation of identifying high‐grade fibrosis was not statistically different; however, the AUROC for MRE was slightly superior to that of TE. Studies with larger cohorts will be required to validate these findings.
pediatrics,gastroenterology & hepatology,nutrition & dietetics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?