A combination of non-invasive tests for the detection of significant fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease is not superior to magnetic resonance elastography alone

Serkan Duman,Digdem Kuru,Mesut Gumussoy,Saba Kiremitci,Hale Gokcan,Bahar Ulas,Zeynep Ellik,Mubin Ozercan,Ramazan Erdem Er,Fatih Karakaya,Emin Bodakci,Ayse Erden,Atilla H. Elhan,Berna Savas,Rohit Loomba,Ramazan Idilman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-023-10441-5
IF: 7.034
2023-11-21
European Radiology
Abstract:ObjectivesThe aims of the present study were to investigate a combination of magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) or MRE and fibrosis score 4 (FIB-4) in the detection of significant fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD).MethodsBetween November 5, 2021, and March 4, 2022, a total of 119 consecutive patients with MASLD were included. Liver stiffness was measured using liver biopsy, MRE, VCTE, and FIB-4. Data were collected from outpatient visit charts. Significant fibrosis was defined as ≥ stage 2 fibrosis.ResultsAll 119 MASLD patients were Caucasian, and their median age was 55 years. MRE, VCTE, and FIB-4 demonstrated significant accuracy in the detection of significant fibrosis with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.848 ± 0.036 (p < 0.001), 0.632 ± 0.052 (p = 0.012), and 0.664 ± 0.051 (p = 0.001), respectively. However, the diagnostic performance of MRE was superior compared to that of VCTE (AUC difference: 0.216 ± 0.053, p < 0.001) and FIB-4 (AUC difference: 0.184 ± 0.058, p = 0.001). With logistic regression analysis, it was determined that when compared to MRE alone, a combination of MRE and TE (p = 0.880) or MRE and FIB-4 (p = 0.455) were not superior for detecting significant fibrosis.ConclusionsMRE alone is an accurate and non-invasive method for the identification of MASLD patients with significant fibrosis.Clinical relevance statementMagnetic resonance elastography alone accurately detects significant fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.Key Points• In routine clinical practice, several non-invasive biochemical-based biomarkers and imaging methods are widely used to assess liver fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.• Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) is more accurate than vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) or fibrosis score 4 (FIB-4) for assessing liver fibrosis and identifying significant fibrosis in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease.• The combination of MRE and VCTE or MRE and FIB-4 was not superior to MRE alone.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?