The precipitation mechanism of secondary α-phase and formation of a bimodal microstructure in Ti6242S alloy cooled from the α + β phase field

Long Huang,Zhichao Sun,Jing Cao,Zhikun Yin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.157428
IF: 6.2
2021-02-01
Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Abstract:<p>In this study, the precipitation mechanism of secondary α-phase and formation of a bimodal microstructure in Ti6242S alloy cooled from the α + β phase field were investigated. It was found that grain boundary α (α<sub>GB</sub>) precipitated preferentially not only at the triple junction of the β/β boundary, but also at the equiaxed α<sub>p</sub>/β interface and then grew along the β/β boundary. The nucleation and growth of the intragranular α (α<sub>I</sub>) phase were influenced by β grain boundary (GB), the pre-existing equiaxed α (α<sub>p</sub>), and adjacent α<sub>I</sub> grain. α<sub>I</sub> grain preferentially precipitated at equiaxed α<sub>p</sub>/β interface regardless of the presence or absence of a Burgers orientation relationship (BOR) between α<sub>p</sub> and β phases; when there was no BOR, α<sub>I</sub> preferentially precipitated due to self-accommodation (i.e. a special orientation relationship) between the α<sub>p</sub> and adjacent α<sub>I</sub> grains, to minimize the total transformation-strain energy. Meanwhile, two types of nucleation and growth modes (interface instability and sympathetic nucleation) coexisted in their precipitations. Moreover, several microtextured areas (large areas of α phase with similar crystallographic orientations) were observed in the obtained bimodal microstructure. This can be attributed to the fact that the special α variant always occupied a large area by preferential nucleation and growth, which further confirmed the role of the BOR and self-accommodation.</p>
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,metallurgy & metallurgical engineering
What problem does this paper attempt to address?