P335 Development and validation of a Belgian set of quality indicators for inflammatory bowel diseases

L Fierens,C Liefferinckx,J Sabino,E de Dycker,V Wambacq,K Vanhaecht,F Rademakers,P Bossuyt,F Baert,D Baert,M Ferrante
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0465
2024-01-01
Journal of Crohn's and Colitis
Abstract:Abstract Background Quality indicators are standardized, evidence-based measures of health care quality, categorised as structure (to assess the care setting), process (to assess high-quality care actions by healthcare professionals) or outcome indicators (results of actions undertaken by healthcare professionals). Several quality indicator sets have been developed to standardise, measure and optimise IBD care. Our aim was to develop and validate a set to assess IBD care in Belgium and to select a subset of indicators with room for improvement that can be used to implement and improve care in clinical practice. Methods The importance of 221 quality indicators (49 structure, 135 process and 37 outcome) identified through literature was scored on a 10-point Likert scale in a two-round modified Delphi exercise by IBD experts. In a third round, the experts indicated and ranked their top 10 indicators with most room for improvement benefitting the patient in the Belgian healthcare system to agree on an improvement subset. In parallel, patient perspectives were collected through two linguistic patient focus groups, one in Flemish (6 participants) and one in French (4 participants). A final consensus meeting was organised to discuss 1) the patient perspectives gained through the focus groups, 2) the results of two Delphi scoring rounds and 3) the results of the additional ranking round. Indicators scoring ≥7 by ≥80% of the participants during the second scoring round, or based on agreement during the consensus meeting, were included in the final set. Results Thirty-two experts (11 IBD nurses and 21 clinicians including 2 paediatricians) participated in all three voting rounds, of which 19 also participated in the consensus meeting (6 IBD nurses and 13 IBD clinicians including 2 IBD paediatricians). In total, 199 quality indicators were agreed upon to assess IBD care in Belgium (41 structure, 123 process and 35 outcome). Eighteen (3 structure, 14 process and 1 outcome; Table) were retained in the improvement subset, related to patient characteristics, endoscopy guidelines, infection prevention, steroid use, the IBD care team, services provided in the IBD clinic, the documentation of patient characteristics, the care pathway and the monitoring of disease activity. The decision to include the latter five themes was driven by the importance to patients, which was evident from the patient focus groups. Conclusion An evidence and consensus based set of quality indicators was developed and validated - including an improvement subset - allowing Belgian IBD centres to evaluate quality of provided care, set up quality improvement projects and potentially launch a benchmarking study.
gastroenterology & hepatology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper aims to address the quality assessment and improvement of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care in Belgium. Specifically, the research team aims to develop and validate a set of quality indicators for IBD care applicable to Belgium, and select a subset with room for improvement from them for implementation in clinical practice and to enhance the quality of care. ### Research Background Quality indicators are standardized, evidence - based healthcare quality measurement tools, which can be divided into structural indicators (used to assess the care environment), process indicators (used to assess high - quality care actions provided by healthcare workers), and outcome indicators (reflecting the results of actions taken by healthcare workers). Multiple sets of quality indicators have been developed to standardize, measure, and optimize IBD care. However, these indicators may not be fully suitable for the specific situation in Belgium, so a quality indicator system specifically for IBD care in Belgium needs to be developed. ### Research Methods - **Expert Scoring**: 221 potential quality indicators (49 structural indicators, 135 process indicators, and 37 outcome indicators) were identified through literature, and scored by experts in the IBD field through a two - round modified Delphi method, with a scoring range of 1 to 10. - **Expert Ranking**: In the third round, experts pointed out the top 10 indicators they thought were most likely to improve patient care in the Belgian healthcare system and ranked them. - **Patient Perspective**: The patient perspective was collected through two patient focus groups with different languages (a Dutch - speaking group with 6 participants; a French - speaking group with 4 participants). - **Consensus Meeting**: A final consensus meeting was organized to discuss the feedback from the patient focus groups, the results of the two - round Delphi scoring, and the additional ranking results. Indicators with a score of ≥7 and agreed by at least 80% of the participants, or those on which consensus was reached at the consensus meeting, were included in the final set of quality indicators. ### Research Results - **Expert Participation**: A total of 32 experts (11 IBD nurses and 21 doctors, including 2 pediatricians) participated in all three rounds of voting, and 19 of them also participated in the consensus meeting. - **Final Indicators**: Finally, 199 quality indicators (41 structural indicators, 123 process indicators, and 35 outcome indicators) were determined for assessing IBD care in Belgium. - **Improvement Subset**: From these indicators, 18 indicators with room for improvement (3 structural indicators, 14 process indicators, and 1 outcome indicator) were screened out. These indicators cover patient characteristics, endoscopic examination guidelines, infection prevention, hormone use, IBD care teams, services provided by IBD clinics, recording of patient characteristics, care pathways, and monitoring of disease activity. The selection of these five topics was driven by the importance of the feedback from the patient focus groups. ### Conclusion This study successfully developed and validated a set of evidence - based and consensus - based quality indicators for IBD care, including an improvement subset. This set of indicators will help IBD centers in Belgium assess the quality of care provided, set up quality improvement projects, and may initiate a benchmarking study.