Abstract:Objectives: This study reports on the results of a project that was initiated by the German pension fund and the statutory health insurers and conducted in 2009 to 2010 with the goal of developing, arranging and testing instruments for quality assurance for the outcome (including patient satisfaction) in inpatient medical rehabilitation centres for children and adolescents. Method: After a 6-month concept phase in which instruments were developed using value benefit analyses, expert consensus procedures, surveys of centres, and qualitative (cognitive interviews) and quantitative (psychometric tests) pre-studies, data were collected in 23 child and adolescent rehabilitation centres using the instruments that had been developed. The project was limited to the following 4 main diagnoses: obesity, bronchial asthma, atopic eczema, and hyperkinetic disorders as well as related disorders (ICD: F90-F94). Children and adolescents over the age of 12 years were interviewed themselves, for younger children, the parents were interviewed. It was decided to include 7 constructs that can be considered as indicators of the quality of the outcome or of patient satisfaction: generic and disease-specific quality of life, perceived change in health, body function parameters (e. g., blood pressure), disease-related self-management, satisfaction of the children/adolescents with rehabilitation, and parent satisfaction. Results: With respect to quality of life, blood pressure, Munich fitness test and lung function parameters, low to medium effects were achieved; with respect to body mass index, SCORAD score and disease-related self-management, the effects were strong. The results can be summarised to the effect that rehabilitation generally achieves noticeable effects in the areas where the impairment is pronounced. In both the parent and the rehabilitation patient survey, there was a high level of satisfaction. The parents of rehab patients under the age of 12 years gave the centres an average assessment of 1.6 to 1.8; rehab patients over the age of 12 years gave the centres an average grade of 2.0 (1=very good to 5=very bad). The differences among the centres were very low after risk adjustment, especially for outcome quality. Conclusions: The strengths of the instruments that were developed are that a scientifically demanding quality measurement was conducted (e. g., combination of indirect and direct measurement of change, several methodological approaches to measuring results, wide range of endpoints analysed, homogeneous comparison groups, elaborate risk adjustment process). There are limitations, especially with respect to the rather great effort needed and not particularly high power for the comparison of centres. The German pension fund and the statutory health insurers are now discussing on the basis of the results of the project the routine implementation of quality assurance in children/adolescent rehabilitation and concrete steps that can be taken to implement it in routine health care.

[Development of an indicator set for the evaluation of the quality of routine ambulatory health care for common disorders in children and adolescents]

Development of indicators for a nationwide cross-sectoral quality assurance procedure for mental health care of patients with schizophrenia, schizotypal and delusional disorders in Germany

Quality indicators for care in juvenile idiopathic arthritis

[Methodological Standard for the Development of Quality Indicators within Clinical Practice Guidelines - Results of a structured consensus process]

Systematic Quality Monitoring For Specialized Palliative Care Services: Development of a Minimal Set of Quality Indicators for Palliative Care Study (QPAC)

[Outcome quality in rehabilitation of children and adolescents: results of project aiming at the development of a quality assurance programme]

Development and Validation of a Quality Indicator System for Outpatient Service in Shenzhen, China.

Consented indicators for the evaluation of integrated strategies of community health promotion targeting children and adolescents: results of an eDelphi

Establishing a paediatric critical care core quality measure set using a multistakeholder, consensus-driven process

Developing ‘high impact’ guideline-based quality indicators for UK primary care: a multi-stage consensus process

Clinimetric properties and suitability of selected quality indicators for assessing antibiotic use in hospitalized adults: a multicentre point prevalence study in 24 hospitals in Germany

Mental health indicators for children and adolescents in OECD countries: a scoping review

Validation of quality indicators for evaluating geriatric pharmacotherapy services in primary care: a mixed methods study

Quality improvement competency gaps in primary care in Albanian, polish and slovenian contexts: a study protocol

Screening for Quality of Life in a Neurology Tic Clinic Using Quality Improvement Methodology

P335 Development and validation of a Belgian set of quality indicators for inflammatory bowel diseases

Development of a Health-State Classification System for the Pediatric Quality-of-Life Inventory Version 4.0 Generic Core Scales for Preference-Based Valuation in Australia

[Quality criteria of internet-based cognitive-behavioral interventions for children and adolescents and their parents - A systematic review]

The use of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adolescents as an outcome criterion to evaluate family oriented support for young carers in Germany: an integrative review of the literature

Selection of primary health care quality indicators in Europe: A Delphi study protocol

Development and pilot-testing of an evidence-based quality indicator set for home mechanical ventilation care: the OVER-BEAS project