Abstract:Additive manufacturing (AM) is recognized as a core technology for producing high-value components. The production of complex and individually modified components, as well as prototypes, gives additive manufacturing a substantial advantage over conventional subtractive machining. For most industries, some of the current barriers to implementing AM include the lack of build repeatability and a deficit of quality assurance standards. The mechanical properties of the components depend critically on the density achieved. Therefore, defect/porosity analysis must be carried out to verify the components’ integrity and viability. In parts produced using AM, the detection of unfused powder using computed tomography is challenging because the detection relies on differences in density. This study presents an optimized methodology for differentiating between unfused powder and voids in additive manufactured components, using computed tomography. Detecting the unfused powder requires detecting the cavities between particles. Previous studies have found that the detection of unfused powder requires a voxel size that is as small as 4 μm 3 . For most applications, scanning using a small voxel size is not reasonable because of the part size, long scan time, and data analysis. In this study, different voxel sizes are used to compare the time required for scanning, and the data analysis showing the impact of voxel size on the detection of micro defects. The powder used was Ti6Al4V, which has a grain size of 45–100 μm, and is typically employed by Arcam electron beam melting (EBM) machines. The artifact consisted of a 6 mm round bar with designed internal features ranging from 50 μm to 1400 μm and containing a mixture of voids and unfused powder. The diameter and depth of the defects were characterized using a focus variation microscope, after which they were scanned using a Nikon XTH225 industrial CT to measure the artifacts and characterize the internal features for defects/pores. To reduce the number of the process variables, the measurement parameters, such as filament current, acceleration voltage, and X-ray filtering material and thickness were kept constant. The VGStudio MAX 3.0 (Volume Graphics, Germany) software package was used for data processing, surface determination, and defects/porosity analysis. The main focus of this study is to explore the optimal methods for enhancing the detection of pores/defects while minimizing the time taken for scanning, data analysis, and determining the effects of noise on the analysis.

Surface texture measurement for additive manufacturing

Comparison of Optical and Stylus Methods for Surface Texture Characterisation in Industrial Quality Assurance of Post-Processed Laser Metal Additive Ti-6Al-4V

Effect of Cut-Off, Evaluation Length, and Measurement Area in Profile and Areal Surface Texture Characterization of As-Built Metal Additive Manufactured Components

Surface analysis in additive manufacturing: A systematic literature review regarding powder bed fusion processes

Surface Texture Characterization of Metal Selective Laser Melted Part With Varying Surface Inclinations

Characterisation Methods for Powder Bed Fusion Processed Surface Topography

A methodology for the 3D characterization of surfaces using X-ray computed tomography: Application to additively manufactured parts

An experimental investigation of the influence of SLM input factors on the as-built AlSi10Mg surface quality

Optical and XCT Measurement of Additively Manufactured Surfaces

(Digital Presentation) Understanding Metal Additive Manufactured Surfaces

An Investigation of the Mechanical Filtering Effect of Tactile CMM in the Measurement of Additively Manufactured Parts

Image Data-Based Surface Texture Characterization and Prediction Using Machine Learning Approaches for Additive Manufacturing

Correlation between surface texture and internal defects in laser powder-bed fusion additive manufacturing

Focus Variation Measurement and Prediction of Surface Texture Parameters Using Machine Learning in Laser Powder Bed Fusion

The Influence of Printing Orientation on Surface Texture Parameters in Powder Bed Fusion Technology with 316L Steel

In Situ Surface Topography of Laser Powder Bed Fusion Using Fringe Projection

Scanning Optical Microscopy for Porosity Quantification of Additively Manufactured Components

The effect of primary processing parameters on surface roughness in laser powder bed additive manufacturing

Considerations on the surface roughness of SLM processed metal parts and the effects of subsequent sandblasting

Thermographic Microstructure Monitoring in Electron Beam Additive Manufacturing

Development of an Additive Manufactured Artifact to Characterize Unfused Powder Using Computed Tomography