No fitness effects of same‐sex copulations in male red flour beetles

Birte M. Martens,Oliver Y. Martin,Tim Janicke,Lennart Winkler
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.11027
IF: 3.167
2024-03-21
Ecology and Evolution
Abstract:We find that same‐sex matings have limited costs in the red‐flour beetle, which may relax selection for efficient sex recognition. Same‐sex copulations are an evolutionary paradox because they do not result in offspring and hence seem a waste of resources. We examined the mating behavior and future reproductive success of male red flour beetles performing same‐sex behavior. Same‐sex sexual behavior occurs in diverse animal taxa, yet its evolutionary maintenance is poorly understood as such behavior seems to be costly and does not directly increase reproductive success. We used male Tribolium castaneum beetles, which frequently engage in same‐sex copulations, to test if same‐sex sexual behavior influences future male mating behavior and reproductive success of males. Furthermore, we tested whether same‐sex sexual behavior has benefits via indirect sperm translocation. We conducted a series of mating trials demonstrating that males exposed to same‐sex behavior did not sire less offspring compared to control males that did not engage in same‐sex behavior. This suggests that same‐sex copulations did not lead to fitness costs in subsequent mating interactions. In addition, we found no evidence that indirect sperm translocation via an intermediate male occurs in T. castaneum. Taken together, these results imply that same‐sex sexual behavior in males is associated with no costs in terms of lower mating rate and reduced siring success and does not seem to entail benefits. Moreover, our data conform to the hypothesis that sexual indiscrimination is prevalent in this species, which may explain the relatively high frequency of same‐sex sexual behavior in T. castaneum.
ecology,evolutionary biology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?