Abstract:In conventional structures, the earthquake-resistant design is based on flexibility after yielding of structural members to provide a loss of earthquake input energy, while, using dampers, the input energy loss can be concentrated in predetermined points to prevent the nonlinear behavior of the main members that are also in the gravity bearing path. However, near-fault earthquakes might cause unexpected failure and severe structural damage, especially those with the pulse-like effect. A pulsed movement in the near field records in this system will, however, result in unusual behavior. Technology advances and the creation of vibration control systems have helped control this type of behavior since the earthquake forces are applied indirectly to the structure. For further investigation of this issue, in this study, some traditional two-dimensional frames were modeled for 3, 8, and 12 floors. Seven near-fault pulsed and seven far-fault nonpulsed accelerometers are applied. The structural behavior in four modes is examined: (1) without damper and soil-structure interaction effect, (2) without damper and considering soil-structure interaction effect, (3) with damper and considering soil-structure interaction, and (4) with damper without considering soil-structure interaction. Each model is analyzed in OpenSees software under incremental dynamic analysis. Then, the fragility curve is plotted based on the results. The results indicate that frame (4) reaches the failure level at a higher spectral acceleration, which means that the performance of the viscous damper in reducing drift between floors is one of the main criteria for predicting damages. It also shows the effect of soil-structure interaction on increasing the drift between floors and reaching failure at lower spectral acceleration in all models. Also, by comparing the fragility curves of the models under near-field and far-field records, it is found that the probability of failure under far-field documents (without pulse) is less than that under near-field documents (with a pulse).

Seismic Response of Yielding Structures Coupled to Rocking Walls with Supplemental Damping

Earthquake Response Analysis of Yielding Structures Coupled with Rocking Walls

Timber shear walls: numerical assessment of the equivalent viscous damping

Inelastic Yielding Strength Demand Coefficient Spectra

Nonstationary Seismic Responses of Structure with Nonlinear Stiffness Subject to Modulated Kanai–Tajimi Excitation

Study on Dynamics of an Elastic Oscillator Coupled with a Rocking Wall

Seismic Fragility Evaluation of Rc Frame Structures Retrofitted with Controlled Concrete Rocking Column and Damping Technique

A finite element model for seismic response analysis of deformable rocking frames

Additional viscous dampers for double-column rocking bridge system: Seismic response and overturning analysis

RANDOM SEISMIC RESPONSE ANALYSIS OF ADJACENT BUILDINGS COUPLED WITH NON-LINEAR HYSTERETIC DAMPERS

Seismic behavior of multi-story structural walls under cyclic lateral loading: Experimental study

A rigid‐flexible coupled rocking structure with nonlinear stress distribution along its base: Analytical modeling, validation and parametric investigation

Linear‐elastic Lateral Load Analysis and Seismic Design of Pin‐supported Wall‐frame Structures with Yielding Dampers

Seismic Performance Assessment of Ordinary Moment Resisting Frame Equipped with Viscous Dampers under Pulse-Like Earthquakes

A finite element model for seismic response analysis of free-standing rocking columns with vertical dampers

Effect of Damper Sub-System Stiffness on the Response of a Single Degree of Freedom System Equipped with a Viscous Damper

Seismic response of rocking frames with top support eccentricity

Seismic performance and damage incurred by monolithic concrete self-centering rocking walls under the effect of axial stress ratio

Inelastic Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Shear Wall Structures under Seismic Excitation

STUDY ON THE INFLUENCE OF POST-YIELDING STIFFNESS TO THE SEISMIC RESPONSE OF BUILDING STRUCTURES

Energy dissipation mechanisms in three‐dimensional rocking motion of cylindrical structures