Compliance of AE and Apo Indices Variations during 23−24 Solar Cycles

T. L. Gulyaeva
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s0016793224600115
2024-06-20
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
Abstract:The auroral electrojet index AE is often used in forecasting models as a driver of the disturbance propagation in the geosphere from the pole to middle and low latitudes. However, these data are not available digitally since January 2020. Instead of the AE -index, we suggest using the recently introduced 1 h Apo -index, given the close proximity of magnetometer networks for these indices at high latitudes and the availability of the Apo -index in real time. To this end their correlation is analyzed during 276 intense storms for 1995–2017. Storm profiles are constructed by method of superposed epochs with zero epoch time t 0 = 0 taken at the threshold value of AE ≥ 1000 nT. A comparison is made of the storm profiles of AE ( t ), Apo ( t ), the interplanetary electric field E ( t ) and the solar wind speed Vsw ( t ) within 72 h: 24 h before the storm peak t 0 , and 48 h afterward. A good agreement is obtained between the sets of AE ( t ) and Apo ( t ) with a correlation coefficient of 0.70. Comparison with the interplanetary parameters testifies on the correlation of AE ( t ) and Apo ( t ) with the electric field E ( t ) but missing their linkage with the solar wind speed Vsw ( t ). A two-parametric formula is derived for dependence of the auroral electrojet index AE ( t ) on the interplanetary electric field E ( t ) and the geomagnetic Apo ( t ) index for the geomagnetic storm forecasting. In the absence of E ( t ) data, formulae for the dependence of AE ( t ) on Apo ( t ) is introduced for implementation in real time and the inverse dependence of Apo ( t ) on AE ( t ) for reconstruction of the 1 h Apo -index before 1995. Validation of the proposed models with data for 5 intense storms in 2018 has shown a close resemblance of the model with observation data of the AE -index with a high coefficient of determination R 2 ranging from 0.62 to 0.81.
geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?