Abstract:This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the 17 March 2015 geomagnetic storm using the high-resolution version of the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model and the total electron content observations from a dense global navigation satellite system network. Driven by time-dependent high-latitude ionospheric convection and auroral precipitation inputs, together with an empirically defined subauroral plasma stream (SAPS) field, our simulation reproduce many observed storm-related ionospheric phenomena, including large-scale traveling ionospheric disturbances over Europe, the effects of prompt penetration electric field over South and Central America, and the formation of a storm-enhanced density (SED) plume across the continental United States. Our simulation results reaffirm a number of important characteristics concerning the SED plume: (1) enhanced background ionospheric density is a necessary but not sufficient condition, and enhanced ion drift is required to form the SED plume; (2) the SAPS flow channel does not directly transport the plasma from midnight to postnoon via dusk to form the SED plume, instead, the SED plume is formed at the equatorward and westward edge of the SAPS channel; and (3) the SED plume appears to subcorotate with respect to the Earth. Plain Language Summary Storm-induced ionospheric density variations are a major concern of near-Earth space environment as they could drastically disrupt satellite navigation and telecommunication systems. Although ionospheric disturbances such as traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs) and storm-enhanced density (SED) are commonly observed during geomagnetic storms, accurate specification of these phenomena remains a great challenge for geospace models. This paper presents a detailed model-data comparative study of the well-known March 2015 St. Patrick's Day storm. The simulated TIDs and SED structures from the thermosphere-ionosphere-electrodynamic general circulation model (TIEGCM) are compared with the total electron content observations for a dense global navigation satellite system (GNSS) network over Europe, South and Central America, as well as North America. While the model reproduces many observed storm-related ionospheric features, quantitative differences between the simulation results and the GNSS data indicate that further improvements to the TIEGCM (such as a more realistic, self-consistent electrodynamic coupling of the ionosphere and magnetosphere) are required in order to meet the challenges of space weather specification and eventually forecast. This study not only serves a meaningful validation of our numerical model but also sheds some new lights on an apparent paradox concerning the formation of the SED plume. Key Points We have carried out a detailed model-data comparison as a way to validate the model outputs Our simulation results reproduce many observed features, including traveling ionospheric disturbances and the storm-enhanced density plume Our results shed new lights on the formation of the SED plume and its subcorotation motion

Validating the IRI-2020 Model for Ionospheric Storms over the North-east Asian sector induced by Extreme Geomagnetic Storms

Analysis of the 3-D Evolution Characteristics of Ionospheric Anomalies During a Geomagnetic Storm Through Fusion of GNSS and COSMIC-2 Data

Assessment of the Performance of Ionospheric Models with NavIC Observations during Geomagnetic Storms

Topside Ionospheric Conditions During the 7–8 September 2017 Geomagnetic Storm

Validation of the IRI-2020 topside ionosphere options through in-situ electron density observations by low-Earth-orbit satellites

Large-Scale Ionospheric Disturbances During the 17 March 2015 Storm: A Model-Data Comparative Study

Ionospheric electric field variations during a geomagnetic storm simulated by a coupled magnetosphere ionosphere thermosphere (CMIT) model

Analysis of Ionospheric Delay Correction Model Performance During Geomagnetic Storms

Thermosphere Model Assessment for Geomagnetic Storms from 2001-2023

Ionospheric Response to the Initial Phase of Geomagnetic Storms: Common Features

Regional differences of the ionospheric response to the July 2012 geomagnetic storm

Effects of Local Time on the Variations of the Total Electron Contents at an American and Asian longitudes and Their comparison with IRI-2016, IRI-Plas2017 and NeQuick-2 models during solar cycle 24.

Multi-Instrument Observation of the Ionospheric Irregularities and Disturbances during the 23–24 March 2023 Geomagnetic Storm

A storm-time global electron density reconstruction model in three-dimensions based on artificial neural networks

An Ionospheric Total Electron Content Model with a Storm Option over Japan Based on a Multi-Layer Perceptron Neural Network

Contrasting Behavior of the F2 Peak and the Topside Ionosphere in Response to the 2 October 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Comparative studies of Ionospheric models with GNSS and NavIC over the Indian Longitudinal sector during geomagnetic activities

Long‐lasting Negative Ionospheric Storm Effects in Low and Middle Latitudes During the Recovery Phase of the 17 March 2013 Geomagnetic Storm

Modeling Investigation of Ionospheric Storm Effects over Millstone Hill During August 4–5, 1992

Vertical Characterization on Global Ionospheric Variations During the Magnetic Storm in September 2017 with Hierarchical Subtraction Method

Assessment of the accuracy of IRI-2016 model at the equatorial-, low-, mid-, and high-latitudes ionosphere along 30-45 o E meridian lines during minimum (2009) and maximum (2013) phases of solar cycle 24