Abstract:An essential feature common to all empirical social research is variability across units of analysis. Individuals differ not only in background characteristics and outcomes of interest, but also in how they respond to a particular treatment, intervention, or stimulation. Moreover, individuals may self-select into treatment on the basis of their anticipated treatment effects. To study heterogeneous treatment effects in the presence of self-selection, Heckman and his colleagues have developed a structural approach that builds on the marginal treatment effect (MTE). In this paper, we propose a revision of the MTE-based approach through a redefinition of the MTE. Specifically, we redefine MTE as the expected treatment effect conditional on the propensity score (instead of the vector of observed covariates) as well as a latent variable representing unobserved resistance to treatment. The redefined MTE is superior to the original MTE in a number of aspects. First, while it is conditional on a unidimensional summary of covariates, it is sufficient to capture all of the treatment effect heterogeneity that is consequential for selection bias. Second, the new MTE is a bivariate function, thus much easier than the original MTE to be visualized. Third, as with the original MTE, the new MTE can also be used as a building block with which to estimate causal effects in the aggregate. However, the weights associated with the new MTE are simpler, more intuitive, and much easier to implement. Finally, the newly defined MTE allows us to directly assess treatment effect heterogeneity among individuals who are at the margin of treatment. As a result, it can be used to evaluate a wide range of policy changes with little analytical effort, and to design policy interventions that maximize the marginal benefits of treatment.

Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Social Networks

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective

Effect or Treatment Heterogeneity? Policy Evaluation with Aggregated and Disaggregated Treatments

Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation

Estimating individual treatment effect: generalization bounds and algorithms

Data-Driven Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection : A Propensity Score Perspective *

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects: Mutual Information Bounds and Learning Algorithms.

A Differential Effect Approach to Partial Identification of Treatment Effects

Bounds on direct and indirect effects under treatment/mediator endogeneity and outcome attrition

Heterogeneous treatment effects analysis for social scientists: A review

Accounting for Missing Covariates in Heterogeneous Treatment Estimation

Partially Identified Heterogeneous Treatment Effect with Selection: An Application to Gender Gaps

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data

Heterogeneous interventional indirect effects with multiple mediators: non-parametric and semi-parametric approaches

Estimating Causal Moderation Effects with Randomized Treatments and Non-Randomized Moderators

Fair and Robust Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Policy Learning

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using a Conditional Moment Based Approach

Policy Relevant Treatment Effects with Multidimensional Unobserved Heterogeneity

Causal inference and heterogeneity bias in social science.