Abstract:Abstract Background: Propensity score weighting methods are frequently used in observational studies to estimate causal effects. However, researchers usually evaluate their performance only in homogeneous populations. When treatment effects are heterogeneous, it is unclear about the ability of commonly used weighting methods in estimating the average treatment effect (ATE) for the whole population. Methods: Two categories of propensity score weighting approaches are discussed to estimate the ATE for the whole population with heterogeneity: one in which the target of inference is the whole population, including Stabilized inverse probability weighting (SIPW), Empirical likelihood weighting (ELW), Covariate balancing propensity score weighting (CBPS); and the other whose target of inference is the specific population, including Inverse probability weighting with trimming (IPWT), Overlap weighting (OW). To assess the performance of these methods, a simulation study was conducted in terms of bias and root mean square error (RMSE), under six heterogeneity scenarios and three degrees of overlap in the propensity score distributions. Results: According to simulation results, approaches that target the specific population have a substantial bias that rises quickly with increasing heterogeneity. In contrast, approaches for the whole population perform well with relatively smaller bias and RMSE, where CBPS outperforms the others in all heterogeneity scenarios and overlap degrees. When methods are applied to Lindner data with heterogeneity, the results of approaches for the whole population are quite different from approaches for the specific population. Conclusions: When the estimand is the ATE for the whole populations with heterogeneity, applying weighting methods that target specific populations (e.g. IPWT, OW) to estimate it would lead to substantial bias. It is recommended to use methods targeting the whole population (e.g. CBPS, ELW) to achieve this goal.

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection : A Propensity Score Perspective *

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in the Presence of Self-Selection: A Propensity Score Perspective

Marginal Treatment Effects from a Propensity Score Perspective

Propensity Score–based Methods Versus MTE-based Methods in Causal Inference

Estimating Heterogeneous Treatment Effects with Observational Data

Marginal Treatment Effects in the Absence of Instrumental Variables

The Role of Propensity Score Structure in Asymptotic Efficiency of Estimated Conditional Quantile Treatment Effect

Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects Using a Conditional Moment Based Approach

Estimating treatment effect heterogeneity in randomized program evaluation

Robust nonparametric estimation of average treatment effects: A propensity score‐based varying coefficient approach

The Role of Propensity Score Structure in Asymptotic Efficiency of Estimated Conditional Quantile Treatment Effect

Treatment Effects with Multidimensional Unobserved Heterogeneity: Identification of the Marginal Treatment Effect

Evaluating propensity score weighting methods in heterogeneous population: a comparative study

Comparing Propensity Score-Based Methods in Estimating the Treatment Effects: A Simulation Study

Generalized propensity score for estimating the average treatment effect of multiple treatments

Targeted Learning on Variable Importance Measure for Heterogeneous Treatment Effect

Propensity Score Matching underestimates Real Treatment Effect, in a simulated theoretical multivariate model

Estimation of treatment effects under endogeneous heteroskedasticity

Heterogeneous treatment effects analysis for social scientists: A review

Identification and Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Non-compliance or Non-ignorable assignment

Doubly robust estimation of average treatment effect revisited