Abstract:The convenient access to observational data enables us to learn causal effects without randomized experiments. This research direction draws increasing attention in research areas such as economics, healthcare, and education. For example, we can study how a medicine (the treatment) causally affects the health condition (the outcome) of a patient using existing electronic health records. To validate causal effects learned from observational data, we have to control confounding bias the influence of variables which causally influence both the treatment and the outcome. Existing work along this line overwhelmingly relies on the unconfoundedness assumption that there do not exist unobserved confounders. However, this assumption is untestable and can even be untenable. In fact, an important fact ignored by the majority of previous work is that observational data can come with network information that can be utilized to infer hidden confounders. For example, in an observational study of the individual-level treatment effect of a medicine, instead of randomized experiments, the medicine is often assigned to each individual based on a series of factors. Some of the factors (e.g., socioeconomic status) can be challenging to measure and therefore become hidden confounders. Fortunately, the socioeconomic status of an individual can be reflected by whom she is connected in social networks. With this fact in mind, we aim to exploit the network information to recognize patterns of hidden confounders which would further allow us to learn valid individual causal effects from observational data. In this work, we propose a novel causal inference framework, the network deconfounder, which learns representations to unravel patterns of hidden confounders from the network information. Empirically, we perform extensive experiments to validate the effectiveness of the network deconfounder on various datasets.

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Social Networks

Learning Individual Treatment Effects from Networked Observational Data.

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects for Networks, Panels, and other Outcome Matrices

Randomization Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects under Network Interference

Heterogeneous Treatment and Spillover Effects under Clustered Network Interference

Uncovering Sociological Effect Heterogeneity using Machine Learning

On Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Heterogeneous Causal Graphs

Treatment Effect Accounting for Network Changes

Learning Individual Causal Effects from Networked Observational Data

Causal Effects with Hidden Treatment Diffusion on Observed or Partially Observed Networks

Estimation of individual causal effects in network setup for multiple treatments

Learning Individual Treatment Effects under Heterogeneous Interference in Networks.

Treatment-Aware Hyperbolic Representation Learning for Causal Effect Estimation with Social Networks

The Network Propensity Score: Spillovers, Homophily, and Selection into Treatment

Data-Driven Estimation of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects

Causal Inference for Social Network Data

Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Bounds under Sample Selection with an Application to the Effects of Social Media on Political Polarization

Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Panel Data

Counterfactual Evaluation of Treatment Assignment Functions with Networked Observational Data.

Estimating Causal Effects Under Interference Using Bayesian Generalized Propensity Scores

Using Embeddings for Causal Estimation of Peer Influence in Social Networks