A Comparison of the Co-Treatment of Urban Wastewater and Acidic Water Using a Ternary Emergy Diagram

Luigi Bravo Toledo,Jorge Alberto Montaño Pisfil,César Augusto Rodríguez Aburto,Edgar del Águila Vela,José Antonio Poma García,Claudia Rossana Poma García,Jorge Luis Poma García,Beatriz Montaño Miranda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16072609
IF: 3.9
2024-03-22
Sustainability
Abstract:The Pasco region in Peru is an area that has historically been polluted by mining activity and population growth. As a result, there is an increased production of urban wastewater and acidic water that contaminate local lakes such as Quiulacocha and Patarcocha. The construction of a treatment plant that can treat the different types of wastewaters has not yet been studied, and its sustainability has not yet been evaluated. The objective of this research was to predict the sustainability of co-treatment systems in different scenarios between urban wastewater and acidic water, expressed in terms of a ternary emergy diagram. The design of the co-treatment plant was carried out at an inflow of 10 L/s. The first scenario (Treatment I) has a primary settler for the mixture of urban wastewater and acidic water, while the second scenario (Treatment II) involves a settler and a subsurface artificial wetland, and the third scenario (Treatment IIIa and IIb) presents a settler, an electrocoagulation system and a secondary settler; this scenario differentiates between the use of urban wastewater and eutrophicated water from Patarcocha Lake. The results of the ternary diagram show the contributions of the fractions of renewable resources from Treatment I (69%), from Treatment II (65.7%), from Treatment IIIa (61.6%), and from Treatment IIIb (21.8%); the fractions of non-renewable resources in Treatment I (26.13%), Treatment II (24.13%), Treatment IIIa (23.33%), and Treatment IIIb (9.50%); and the fractions of imported inputs in Treatment I (4.84%), Treatment II (9.37%), Treatment IIIa (15.04%), and Treatment IIIb (68.72%). It is concluded that the use of a co-treatment system for urban wastewater and acidic water is sustainable in the long term when using an electrocoagulator or an artificial wetland.
environmental sciences,environmental studies,green & sustainable science & technology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the problem of urban wastewater and acid water pollution in the Pasco region of Peru, which is caused by historical mining activities and population growth. Specifically, lakes in the Pasco region, such as Lake Quilacocha and Lake Patalcocha, are severely polluted by urban wastewater and acid water. At present, the construction of a treatment plant that can handle different types of wastewater and its sustainability have not been studied yet. Therefore, the research purpose of this paper is to predict the sustainability of the co - treatment system of urban wastewater and acid water under different scenarios, and use the ternary emergy diagram to express these scenarios. ### Research Background and Problem Description 1. **Regional Background**: - The Pasco region has been polluted historically due to mining activities, which has affected the local water resources. - Local lakes have experienced significant eutrophication, which has an impact on human health and animal and plant species. - Currently, there are no urban wastewater treatment plants in the Pasco region. 2. **Specific Manifestations of the Problem**: - **Acid Water**: It is mainly generated by the oxidation of pyrite (FeS₂) in ores after contact with air and water to produce sulfuric acid, sulfates, dissolved iron and other toxic metals. It has high acidity and high contents of toxic metals and sulfates. - **Urban Wastewater**: It contains high concentrations of microbial pathogens, inorganic and organic substances, especially phosphorus and ammonium. These components can cause eutrophication of water bodies. 3. **Insufficiencies of Existing Solutions**: - The methods of independently treating acid water and urban wastewater have limitations. Additional treatment steps are required to reduce other pollutants, such as sulfates, and improve pH regulation. - There is a lack of a standardized evaluation system, making it difficult to comprehensively evaluate environmental performance and ecological impacts. ### Research Purpose This paper aims to evaluate the sustainability of the co - treatment system of urban wastewater and acid water on a practical scale in the Pasco region through four different co - treatment scenarios. The emergy analysis method, especially the ternary emergy diagram, is used as a tool to assist environmental accounting and decision - making, and to demonstrate the applicability of improvement strategies. ### Four Co - treatment Scenarios 1. **Scenario One (Treatment I)**: - **Design**: A primary sedimentation tank is used for mixing urban wastewater and acid water. - **Characteristics**: The primary sedimentation tank allows the mixing of acid water and urban wastewater, and is equipped with a sludge waste pool. 2. **Scenario Two (Treatment II)**: - **Design**: A primary sedimentation tank and a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. - **Characteristics**: The constructed wetland can significantly improve parameters that cannot be removed by using only the primary sedimentation tank, such as sulfates, and better regulate the pH value. 3. **Scenario Three (Treatment IIIa and IIIb)**: - **Design**: A primary sedimentation tank, an up - flow electro - coagulator (using cylindrical electrodes) and a secondary sedimentation tank. - **Characteristics**: IIIa uses urban wastewater, and IIIb uses eutrophic wastewater from Lake Patalcocha. The difference between these two treatment methods lies in the change of resources, especially the contribution of phosphate, to improve the sustainability of co - treatment. ### Sustainability Indicators 1. **Percentage of Renewable Emergy Use (PR)**: \[ PR=\frac{R + FR + SR}{U} \] where \(R\) is the renewable resource, \(FR\) is the renewable part of the imported input, \(SR\) is the renewable part generated within the system, and \(U\) is the total emergy. 2. **Emergy Yield Ratio (EYR)**: \[ EYR = \frac{U}{FN + SN} \] where \(FN\) is the imported part of non - renewable resources, and \(SN\) is the non - renewable part generated within the system. 3. **Environmental Load Ratio (ELR)**: \[ ELR=\frac{N + FN + SN}{R + FR + SR} \] 4. **Emergy Investment Ratio (EIR)**: \[ EIR=\frac{FN + SN}{R + FR + SR + N} \] 5. **Emergy Sustainability Index (ESI)**: