EP24.26: Using the IDEA consensus 'pulling sleeve' sign to guide surgical decisions

A. Shishkina,I. Mick,M. Marien,M. Leonardi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29033

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 352-352, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Can Ultrasonographic Measurement of Respiratory Variability in the Diameter of the Internal Jugular Vein and the Subclavian Vein Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Parturients During Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Cohort Study

Shaobing Dai,Jianjun Shen,Xia Tao,Xinzhong Chen,Lili Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12184

IF: 3.776

2022-01-01

Heliyon

Abstract:Background: Ultrasonic measurements of the respiratory variability in the diameter of internal jugular vein (IJVCI) and subclavian vein (SCV-CI) have recently been reported to be useful in predicting fluid responses in nonobstetric patients with spontaneous respiration. This study evaluated whether IJV-CI and SCV-CI could reliably predict fluid responsiveness in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Objective: This study was conducted to determine whether two indicators measured by ultrasound are good predictors of fluid responsiveness of parturients with spontaneous respiration in elective cesarean delivery. Design: A prospective cohort study. Setting: A single-center tertiary specialty hospital in China. Patients: A total of 86 patients scheduled for elective cesarean section were included and 6 were excluded for various reasons. Interventions: Based on the results of the fluid challenge, the included parturients were divided into two groups, with those who responded to fluid challenge defined as the positive group and those who did not respond defined as the negative group. Main outcome measures: The primary endpoint was to determine the predictive value of IJV-CI and SCV-CI for fluid responsiveness (>= 15% increases in SVI after fluid challenge) in spontaneous respiration patients. Results: Forty-three (53.8%) parturients were fluid responders. IJV-CI and SCV-CI proved to be the independent predictors for fluid responsiveness by multivariate logistic regression. The area under the ROC curve for IJV-CI and SCV-CI were 0.881 (95% CI, 0.808-0.953, p < 0.0005) and 0.757 (95% CI, 0.648-0.865, p < 0.0008), respectively. Their optimal cut-off values for IJV-CI and SCV-CI were 20.7% (sensitivity of 60%; specificity of 79%) and 32.0% (sensitivity of 34%; specificity of 96%), respectively. The grey zone for IJV-CI and SCV-CI for fluid responsiveness were 20.4-32.4% and 30.4-44.6% and included 25% and 23% of the patients, respectively. Conclusion: Ultrasonic-derived IJV-CI is better than SCV-CI in predicting fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing parturients. Both IJV-CI and SCV-CI are the accurate and readily accessible indices of fluid responsiveness in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery. Trial registration: chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR1900028450).
EP24.05: Prospective study: transvaginal ultrasound for endometriosis, incorporating IDEA consensus and novel superficial endometriosis inclusion

I. Mick,S.M. Freger,M. Marien,M. Gholiof,J. Tigdi,M. Leonardi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29012

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 346-347, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP26.09: Ultrasound‐guided insertion of intrauterine device

D.J. de Souza,L.J. Souza,A.C. Noldin,A.F. Silva Francisco de Souza,G.L. Pedroni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29083

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 363-363, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP19.11: Ultrasound markers as predictors for Foley catheter expulsion during induction of labour

Z. Rostoka,L. Racene,L. Kise,I. Pitkevica,B. Sarta,D. Rezeberga,N. Vedmedovska

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28794

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 298-298, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP21.03: Caesarean scar pregnancy: clinical evolution, ultrasound diagnosis and endoscopic correlations

I. Safonova,R. Safonov

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28845

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 309-309, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP09.71: Fetal echocardiography indications: areas of consensus and controversy between guidelines and expert consensus

V. De Robertis,T. Stampalija,I.G. Ramezzana,P. Volpe

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28452

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 214-215, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP24.30: Pilot study of intra‐ and interoperator agreement of a proposed image quality scoring system for transvaginal ultrasound images

A. Deslandes,J. Avery,M. Leonardi,R. O'Hara,S. Maple,H. Chen,S. Knox,C. Panuccio,G. Lo,M.L. Hull,G. Condous

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29036

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 353-353, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP25.20: Clinical dilemma solved by transperineal ultrasound

P.S. Kulkarni

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29067

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 359-359, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP24.13: Advancing endometriosis mapping: quantifying sliding sign in transvaginal sonography to identify Pouch of Douglas obliteration

F. Shakki Katouli,N. Meimani,L. Bayani,H. Hoseinpoor,F. Azizinik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29020

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 349-349, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP24.09: Ultrasound assessment of the pelvic sidewall: a methodological consensus

G. Szabó,C. Culcasi,E. Gatti,Z.Y. Ng,L. Zanchi,D. Fischerová

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29016

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 348-348, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP01.64: What the clinicians think: the use of a growth parameter decision tool to help standardise care for women having ultrasounds

L.J. Stocker,F. Tomlinson,R. Parasuraman,D.T. Howe,A.J. Kermack

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28077

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 126-126, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP19.19: Angle of progression for predicting second‐stage Caesarean delivery complications

Y. Geron,A. Romano,A. Shmueli,R. Matot,S. Sigal‐Kaplun,S. Daniel,Y. Gilboa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28802

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 300-301, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP26.02: Optimising care: how accurate diagnosis and imaging‐guided interventions can mitigate postoperative complications

S. Athar,S. Akinola Shittu,A. Awadh Alhattami,S. Fatma,K. Maslamani,L. Mohammed Alansari

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29076

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 362-362, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP19.01: A safety bundle for operative vaginal birth

S. Skinner,P. Neil,N. Murray,R. Hodges,C. Carbonnel,B.W. Mol,D.L. Rolnik

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28785

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 295-295, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Addendum to consensus opinion from International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium

S Guerriero,G Condous,M Rolla,G Hudelist,S Ferrero,J L Alcazar,S Ajossa,C Bafort,D Van Schoubroeck,T Bourne,T Van den Bosch,S S Singh,M S Abrao,G Szabó,A C Testa,A Di Giovanni,D Fischerova,C Tomassetti,D Timmerman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.27558

Abstract:Preoperative sonographic staging in patients with suspected parametrial endometriosis is essential to plan surgical intervention and anticipate the need for a multidisciplinary approach, and thus optimize surgical outcome. The results of a recent meta-analysis suggest that there is a need to define more accurately the ultrasonographic criteria for parametrial involvement in endometriosis. This addendum to the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) consensus highlights the sonographic characteristics of the parametrium and identifies ultrasound techniques to diagnose deep endometriosis in this area. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
EP23.15: Diagnostic performance of the IOTA two‐step strategy in an oncological referral centre

G.C. Albertini,G. Ortelli,G. Bogani,S. Palladino,U. Leone Roberti Maggiore,F. Raspagliesi,V. Chiappa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28951

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 332-332, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP19.14: Seeing the unseen: obstetricians' perspectives on intrapartum ultrasound in delivery rooms

M. Oberman,D. Lazar Bar‐David,E. Zamir,R. Levy,S. Perlman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28797

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 299-299, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP24.14: External validation study of preoperative ultrasound‐based AAGL staging system in prediction of AAGL surgical stage

P. McClenahan,J.N. Mak,C. Uzuner,A. Eathorne,M. Espada,A. Gil,S. Reid,G. Condous

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.29021

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 349-349, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP19.22: Ultrasound in labour and delivery

A. Yeskarayeva,V. Lokshin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28805

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 301-301, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
EP23.23: Diagnosis of adnexal lesions using ultrasound‐based artificial intelligence

R. Yoeli‐Bik,E. Lengyel,J.S. Abramowicz,H. Li,R.E. Longman,M. Giger,H.M. Whitney

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28959

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 335-335, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics

EP24.26: Using the IDEA consensus 'pulling sleeve' sign to guide surgical decisions

Can Ultrasonographic Measurement of Respiratory Variability in the Diameter of the Internal Jugular Vein and the Subclavian Vein Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Parturients During Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Cohort Study

EP24.05: Prospective study: transvaginal ultrasound for endometriosis, incorporating IDEA consensus and novel superficial endometriosis inclusion

EP26.09: Ultrasound‐guided insertion of intrauterine device

EP19.11: Ultrasound markers as predictors for Foley catheter expulsion during induction of labour

EP21.03: Caesarean scar pregnancy: clinical evolution, ultrasound diagnosis and endoscopic correlations

EP09.71: Fetal echocardiography indications: areas of consensus and controversy between guidelines and expert consensus

EP24.30: Pilot study of intra‐ and interoperator agreement of a proposed image quality scoring system for transvaginal ultrasound images

EP25.20: Clinical dilemma solved by transperineal ultrasound

EP24.13: Advancing endometriosis mapping: quantifying sliding sign in transvaginal sonography to identify Pouch of Douglas obliteration

EP24.09: Ultrasound assessment of the pelvic sidewall: a methodological consensus

EP01.64: What the clinicians think: the use of a growth parameter decision tool to help standardise care for women having ultrasounds

EP19.19: Angle of progression for predicting second‐stage Caesarean delivery complications

EP26.02: Optimising care: how accurate diagnosis and imaging‐guided interventions can mitigate postoperative complications

EP19.01: A safety bundle for operative vaginal birth

Addendum to consensus opinion from International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group: sonographic evaluation of the parametrium

EP23.15: Diagnostic performance of the IOTA two‐step strategy in an oncological referral centre

EP19.14: Seeing the unseen: obstetricians' perspectives on intrapartum ultrasound in delivery rooms

EP24.14: External validation study of preoperative ultrasound‐based AAGL staging system in prediction of AAGL surgical stage

EP19.22: Ultrasound in labour and delivery

EP23.23: Diagnosis of adnexal lesions using ultrasound‐based artificial intelligence